Ineffectiveness and poor reliability of arsenic removal plants in West Bengal, India

被引:82
作者
Hossain, MA
Sengupta, MK
Ahamed, S
Rahman, MM
Mondal, D
Lodh, D
Das, B
Nayak, B
Roy, BK
Mukherjee, A
Chakraborti, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Sch Environm Studies, Kolkata 700032, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Stat Inst, Kolkata 700108, W Bengal, India
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es048703u
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the recent past, arsenic contamination in groundwater has emerged as an epidemic in different Asian countries, such as Bangladesh, India, and China. Arsenic removal plants (ARP) are one possible option to provide arsenic-safe drinking water. This paper evaluates the efficiency of ARP projects in removing arsenic and iron from raw groundwater, on the basis of our 2-year-long study covering 18 ARPs from 11 manufacturers, both from home and abroad, installed in an arsenic affected area of West Bengal, India, known as the Technology Park Project (TP project). Immediately after installation of ARPs on August 29, 2001, the villagers began using filtered water for drinking and cooking, even though our first analysis on September 13, 2001 found that 10 of 13 ARPs failed to remove arsenic below the WHO provisional guideline value (10 mu g/L), while six plants could not achieve the Indian Standard value (50 mu g/L). The highest concentration of arsenic in filtered water was observed to be 364 mu g/L. Our 2-year study showed that none of the ARPs could maintain arsenic in filtered water below the WHO provisional guideline value and only two could meet the Indian standard value (50 mu g/L) throughout. Standard statistical techniques showed thatARPs from the same manufacturers were not equally efficient. Efficiency of the ARPs was evaluated on the basis of point and interval estimates of the proportion of failure. During the study period almost all the ARPs have undergone minor or major modifications to improve their performance, and after our study, 15 (78%) out of 18 ARPs were no longer in use. In this study, we also analyzed urine samples from villagers in the TP project area and found that 82% of the samples contained arsenic above the normal limit.
引用
收藏
页码:4300 / 4306
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh groundwater: a major environmental and social disaster [J].
Alam, MGM ;
Allinson, G ;
Stagnitti, F ;
Tanaka, A ;
Westbrooke, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (03) :236-253
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J ENVIRON MONITOR, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12665-013-2699-Y
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GUID DRINK WAT QUAL, V1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P BUET UNU INT S FAT
[5]   Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: A human health threat [J].
Berg, M ;
Tran, HC ;
Nguyen, TC ;
Pham, HV ;
Schertenleib, R ;
Giger, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (13) :2621-2626
[6]  
*BIS, 2003, 10500 ISO BIS
[7]   Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: A future danger? [J].
Chakraborti, D ;
Mukherjee, SC ;
Pati, S ;
Sengupta, MK ;
Rahman, MM ;
Chowdhury, UK ;
Lodh, D ;
Chanda, CR ;
Chakraborty, AK ;
Basul, GK .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (09) :1194-1201
[8]   Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent - What lessons have been learned? [J].
Chakraborti, D ;
Rahman, MM ;
Paul, K ;
Chowdhury, UK ;
Sengupta, MK ;
Lodh, D ;
Chanda, CR ;
Saha, KC ;
Mukherjee, SC .
TALANTA, 2002, 58 (01) :3-22
[9]   ARSENIC IN GROUND-WATER IN 6 DISTRICTS OF WEST-BENGAL, INDIA - THE BIGGEST ARSENIC CALAMITY IN THE WORLD .1. ARSENIC SPECIES IN DRINKING-WATER AND URINE OF THE AFFECTED PEOPLE [J].
CHATTERJEE, A ;
DAS, D ;
MANDAL, BK ;
CHOWDHURY, TR ;
SAMANTA, G ;
CHAKRABORTI, D .
ANALYST, 1995, 120 (03) :643-650
[10]   Pattern of excretion of arsenic compounds [arsenite, arsenate, MMA(V), DMA(V)] in urine of children compared to adults from an arsenic exposed area in Bangladesh [J].
Chowdhury, UK ;
Rahman, MM ;
Sengupta, MK ;
Lodh, D ;
Chanda, CR ;
Roy, S ;
Quamruzzaman, Q ;
Tokunaga, H ;
Ando, M ;
Chakraborti, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 38 (01) :87-113