Tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) as maintenance immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients

被引:23
作者
Abou-Jaoude, MM
Najm, R
Shaheen, J
Nawfal, N
Abboud, S
AlHabash, M
Darwish, M
Mulhem, A
Ojjeh, A
Almawi, WY [1 ]
机构
[1] Arabian Gulf Univ, Al Jawhara Ctr Mol Med, Col Med & Med Sci, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Hop Sacre Coeur, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Lebanese Hosp, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Notre Dame De Secours, Jbeil, Lebanon
[5] Al Mouassat Univ Hosp, Damascus, Syria
[6] Al Shami Hosp, Damascus, Syria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.040
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The effects of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine (Neoral) on graft survival, function, and metabolic profile were evaluated in 69 patients receiving Neoral (group 1) and 54 patients receiving FK506 (group 2) for maintenance immunosuppression following kidney transplantation. Recipient and donor demographics and induction therapy were comparable, except for a higher number of sensitized patients in group 2 (n = 13). Acute rejection timing, severity, and infection rates and types were similar in both groups. During hospitalization, at 6 months, and at 1 year following transplantation, no significant differences were noted between groups in fasting glucose, serum cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, or need for insulin or antihypertensive therapy. Mean serum creatinine levels on discharge (1.42 mg/dL +/- 0.14 vs 1.68 mg/dL +/- 0.3), at 1 month (1.45 mg/dL +/- 0.1 vs 1.39 mg/dL +/- 0.11), 3 months (1.46 mg/dL +/- 0.09 vs 1.32 mg/dL +/- 0.14), and 1 year (1.29 mg/dL +/- 0.08 vs 1.19 mg/dL +/- 0.09), but not at 6 months (1.42 +/- 0.37 vs 1.10 +/- 0.07; P = .001), were comparable between groups. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 98.3% for group 1 and 94.5% for group 2. When evaluated for acute rejection, infection, and metabolic differences, we conclude that both tacrolimus and cyclosporine are effective and safe calcineurin inhibitors for short-term use in kidney transplantation. A similar study is proposed to evaluate the long-term effects of both agents.
引用
收藏
页码:3025 / 3028
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Clinical and mechanistic differences between FK506 (tacrolimus) and cyclosporin A [J].
Almawi, WY ;
Melemedjian, OK .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 15 (12) :1916-1918
[2]   Conversion from cyclosporin A to tacrolimus is safe and decreases blood pressure, cholesterol levels and TGF-β1 type I receptor expression [J].
Baan, CC ;
van Riemsdijk-van Overbeeke, IC ;
Balk, AHMM ;
Vantrimpont, PMAJ ;
Mol, WM ;
Knoop, CJ ;
Niesters, HGM ;
Maat, LPWM ;
Weimar, W .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 15 (04) :276-283
[3]   Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus prevents transplant function loss due to acute steroid-resistant or chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients [J].
Blume, C ;
Hollenbeck, M ;
Ivens, K ;
Heering, P ;
Hetzel, GR ;
Grabensee, B .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3161-3163
[4]   Single-center experience with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-Neoral in renal transplant recipients [J].
Boots, JMM ;
van Duijnhoven, EM ;
Christiaans, MHL ;
Nieman, FHM ;
van Suylen, RJ ;
van Hooff, JP .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 14 (06) :370-383
[5]   Conversion to tacrolimus for the treatment of cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity in heart transplant recipients [J].
Israni, A ;
Brozena, S ;
Pankewycz, O ;
Grossman, R ;
Bloom, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (03)
[6]   Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials [J].
Knoll, GA ;
Bell, RC .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7191) :1104-1107
[7]  
Kohnle M, 2000, Transpl Int, V13 Suppl 1, pS345, DOI 10.1007/s001470050358
[8]   Multicenter randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in the prevention of renal allograft rejection - A report of the European Tacrolimus Multicenter Renal Study Group [J].
Mayer, AD ;
Dmitrewski, J ;
Squifflet, JP ;
Besse, T ;
Grabensee, B ;
Klein, B ;
Eigler, FW ;
Heemann, U ;
Pichlmayr, R ;
Behrend, M ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
Donck, J ;
vanHooff, J ;
Christiaans, M ;
Morales, JM ;
Andres, A ;
Johnson, RWG ;
Short, C ;
Buchholz, B ;
Rehmert, N ;
Land, W ;
Schleibner, S ;
Forsythe, JLR ;
Talbot, D ;
Neumayer, HH ;
Hauser, I ;
Ericzon, BG ;
Brattstrom, C ;
Claesson, K ;
Muhlbacher, F ;
Pohanka, E .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (03) :436-443
[9]   A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation [J].
Pirsch, JD ;
Miller, J ;
Deierhoi, MH ;
Vincenti, F ;
Filo, RS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (07) :977-983
[10]   Long-term results after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation for acute and chronic rejection [J].
Reyes, J ;
Jain, A ;
Mazariegos, G ;
Kashyap, R ;
Green, M ;
Iurlano, K ;
Fung, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (12) :2573-2580