The fate of ammonium nitrogen applied to flooded rice as affected by zeolite addition

被引:16
作者
Ando, H [1 ]
Mihara, C [1 ]
Kakuda, K [1 ]
Wada, G [1 ]
机构
[1] NIPPON KOEI CO LTD, CHIYODA KU, TOKYO 102, JAPAN
关键词
CEC; nitrification; rice plant; topdressed; zeolite;
D O I
10.1080/00380768.1996.10416322
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
High rice (Oryza sativa L.) yields are closely related to plant absorption of a large amount of nitrogen (N). However, there is little information on the fate of N applied at the middle growth stages of rice. Labeled N-15 ammonium sulfate was applied at the panicle formation stage in Experiment I, and 10 d after heading in Experiment II. Zeolite was also added at the concentration of 0, 0.01, and 0.1 kg(-1) to increase the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil. The amount of N-15 fertilizer in the soil surface water decreased exponentially and the fertilizer disappeared within 2 d after application. The soil that received zeolite at 0.1 kg kg(-1) exhibited significantly less (NH4+)-N-15-N in the surface water and in the soil solution than the soil without the zeolite amendment. A significantly larger amount of exchangeable (NH4+)-N-15-N was observed in the high zeolite-treatment of soil compared to the low zeolite-treatment of soil. The amount of exchangeable (NH4+)-N-15-N increased initially, and thereafter, decreased to traces 4 d after application in Experiment I, while 6 or 9 d after application in Experiment II. The disappearance of exchangeable (NH4+)-N-15-N could be attributed mainly to the uptake by plants. The zeolite amendment or the time of N application did not significantly affect the amount of immobilized N. The rate of N adsorption was inhibited with increasing zeolite application. Moreover, zeolite application did not increase the recovery percentage of ammonium sulfate by rice plants. The total recovery of applied PIT ranged from 65 to 75%, irrespective of the zeolite treatments or the time of N application.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ANDO H, 1988, JPN J CROP SCI, V57, P678, DOI 10.1626/jcs.57.678
[2]  
ANDO H, 1985, JPN J SOIL SCI PLANT, V56, P53
[3]  
Bremner J.M., 1996, Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis. Part, P1085, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.2ED.C31
[4]  
DE DATTA S.K., 1981, PRINCIPLES PRACTICES
[5]   INFLUENCE OF FIELD ENVIRONMENT AND FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT ON AMMONIA LOSS FROM FLOODED RICE [J].
FILLERY, IRP ;
SIMPSON, JR ;
DEDATTA, SK .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (04) :914-920
[6]   REAPPRAISAL OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION AS AN N LOSS MECHANISM IN FLOODED RICE FIELDS [J].
FILLERY, IRP ;
VLEK, PLG .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1986, 9 (1-2) :79-98
[7]   ESTIMATING AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM FLOODED RICE FIELDS BY SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUES [J].
FRENEY, JR ;
LEUNING, R ;
SIMPSON, JR ;
DENMEAD, OT ;
MUIRHEAD, WA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (04) :1049-1054
[8]  
Kano H., 1974, Journal of the Science of Soil and Manure, Japan (Nippon Dojohiryogaku Zasshi), V45, P549
[9]  
Keeney D. R., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P643
[10]  
*SAS I, 1985, SAS US GUID