Why do some siblings attack each other?: Comparative analysis of aggression in avian broods

被引:25
作者
Gonzalez-Voyer, Alejandro
Szekely, Tamas
Drummond, Hugh
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Lab Concucta, Inst Ecol, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
brood size; feeding method; feeding rate; length of nestling period; phylogenetic generalized least squares; sibling aggression;
D O I
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00152.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In many parentally fed species, siblings compete for food not only by begging and scrambling, but also by violently attacking each other. This aggressive competition has mostly been studied in birds, where it is often combined with dominance subordination, aggressive intimidation, and siblicide. Previous experimental and theoretical studies proposed several life-history, morphological, and behavioral variables that may facilitate the evolution of broodmate aggression, and explain its taxonomic distribution. Here we apply phylogenetic comparative analyses for the first time to test the influence of five hypothesized facilitators of the evolution of broodmate aggression, analyzing 69 species in seven avian families using two quantitative measures of aggression: incidence and intensity. We show that incidence and intensity of aggression increase with long nestling periods and indirect feeding, and small brood size is associated with intense aggression. Large food parcels were not correlated with either the incidence or intensity of aggression. Our study suggests that indirect feeding, long nestling periods, and small broods, possibly in combination with other factors, have tended to favor the evolution of aggressive broodmate competition.
引用
收藏
页码:1946 / 1955
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile [J].
Blomberg, SP ;
Garland, T ;
Ives, AR .
EVOLUTION, 2003, 57 (04) :717-745
[2]   BEGGING INTENSITY OF NESTLING BIRDS VARIES WITH SIBLING RELATEDNESS [J].
BRISKIE, JV ;
NAUGLER, CT ;
LEECH, SM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 258 (1351) :73-78
[3]  
Buehler DM, 2002, WILSON BULL, V114, P122, DOI 10.1676/0043-5643(2002)114[0122:FSAPFR]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Chick begging as a signal: Are nestlings honest? [J].
Cotton, PA ;
Kacelnik, A ;
Wright, J .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (02) :178-182
[6]  
DAVID S, 1987, CAN FIELD NAT, V101, P105
[7]   Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geographic range size -: body size relationship in new world terrestrial carnivora [J].
Diniz, JAF ;
Tôrres, NM .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :351-367
[8]   Dominance in vertebrate broods and litters [J].
Drummond, H .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2006, 81 (01) :3-32
[9]   PARENT-OFFSPRING COOPERATION IN THE BLUE-FOOTED BOOBY (SULA-NEBOUXII) - SOCIAL ROLES IN INFANTICIDAL BROOD REDUCTION [J].
DRUMMOND, H ;
GONZALEZ, E ;
OSORNO, JL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1986, 19 (05) :365-372
[10]   TRAINING SIBLINGS TO BE SUBMISSIVE LOSERS - DOMINANCE BETWEEN BOOBY NESTLINGS [J].
DRUMMOND, H ;
OSORNO, JL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1992, 44 (05) :881-893