Effectiveness of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy

被引:71
作者
Bosi, E
Conti, M
Vermigli, C
Cazzetta, G
Peretti, E
Cordoni, MC
Galimberti, G
Scionti, L
机构
[1] Vita Salute San Raffaele Univ Hosp, Diabet & Endocrinol Unit, Dept Gen Med, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Internal Med, Perugia, Italy
关键词
clinical trial; diabetes; electromagnetic stimulation; painful neuropathy;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-005-1734-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis: The largely unsatisfactory results reported for the pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathy has spurred the search for alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) as a novel treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy. Methods: Patients (n=31) with painful neuropathy associated with decreased nerve conduction velocity (< 40 m/s) and increased vibration perception threshold (> 25 V) were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study designed to compare the effects of FREMS with those of placebo. Each patient received two series of ten treatments of either FREMS or placebo in random sequence, with each series lasting no more than 3 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in pain measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: FREMS induced a significant reduction in daytime and night-time VAS pain score (all p < 0.02). Furthermore, FREMS induced a significant increase in sensory tactile perception, as assessed by monofilament; a decrease in foot vibration perception threshold, as measured by a biothesiometer; and an increase in motor nerve conduction velocity (all p < 0.01). No significant changes were observed after placebo. Comparison of measurements at the 4-month follow-up with those at baseline revealed that a significant benefit persisted for all measures that showed an improvement at the end of treatment, with an additional improvement in quality of life evaluated by the Short Form-36 questionnaire (all p < 0.05). No significant side effects were recorded during the study. Conclusions/interpretation: FREMS is a safe and effective therapy for neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes and is able to modify some parameters of peripheral nerve function.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 823
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Acupuncture for the treatment of chronic painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy: a long-term study [J].
Abuaisha, BB ;
Costanzi, JB ;
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1998, 39 (02) :115-121
[2]  
AIREY M, 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[3]  
ALBERS JW, 1995, ANN NEUROL, V38, P478
[4]   Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Backonja, M ;
Beydoun, A ;
Edwards, KR ;
Schwartz, SL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Hes, M ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Garofalo, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21) :1831-1836
[5]   Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers [J].
Baker, LL ;
Chambers, R ;
DeMuth, SK ;
Villar, F .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (03) :405-412
[6]   Painful diabetic neuropathy [J].
Benbow, SJ ;
Cossins, L ;
MacFarlane, IA .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1999, 16 (08) :632-644
[7]  
Bevilacqua M, 2004, 86 ANN M END SOC, P2
[8]   USE OF A BIOTHESIOMETER TO MEASURE INDIVIDUAL VIBRATION THRESHOLDS AND THEIR VARIATION IN 519 NON-DIABETIC SUBJECTS [J].
BLOOM, S ;
TILL, S ;
SONKSEN, P ;
SMITH, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6433) :1793-1795
[9]   Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications [J].
Brownlee, M .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6865) :813-820
[10]   NERVE FUNCTION IN EXPERIMENTAL DIABETES IN RATS - EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
CAMERON, NE ;
COTTER, MA ;
ROBERTSON, S ;
MAXFIELD, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 264 (02) :E161-E166