Thioguanine offers no advantage over mercaptopurine in maintenance treatment of childhood ALL:: results of the randomized trial COALL-92

被引:57
作者
Harms, DO
Göbel, U
Spaar, HJ
Graubner, UB
Jorch, N
Gutjahr, P
Janka-Schaub, GE
机构
[1] Childrens Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol & Oncol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Childrens Univ Hosp, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Childrens Univ Hosp, Munich, Germany
[4] Childrens Hosp Prof Hess, Bremen, Germany
[5] Childrens Hosp Gilead, Bielefeld, Germany
[6] Childrens Univ Hosp, Mainz, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1182/blood-2002-08-2372
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The German cooperative study group for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (COALL-92) was designed to examine the clinical effectiveness of thioguanine (TG) versus mercaptopurine (MP) in maintenance treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a randomized multicenter trial. TG and MP are prodrugs and have to be converted intracellularly to 6-thioguanine nucleotides (TGNs) for cytostatic activity. TG is converted into TGN in fewer steps and has been shown to be more cytotoxic in equimolar doses in vitro compared with 6-MP. Therefore, a higher effectiveness of TG in maintenance treatment was postulated. Of 521 patients enrolled into the protocol, 474 were randomized to receive either MP or TG during maintenance therapy in a daily oral dose. After a median observation time of 6.6 years, the probability of event-free survival was 79% +/- 3% for the MP group (238 children) and 78% +/- 3% in the TG group (236 patients). In spite of TGN levels, exceeding those of the MP group 7 times, treatment with TG did not improve the outcome but was more complicated to handle due to a specific toxicity profile of prolonged myelosuppression with marked thrombocytopenia. Therefore, MP should remain the preferred drug for maintenance treatment of ALL, unless other studies demonstrate superiority of TG in larger trials or selected patient groups. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
引用
收藏
页码:2736 / 2740
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   THE CYTOTOXICITY OF THIOGUANINE VS MERCAPTOPURINE IN ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
ADAMSON, PC ;
POPLACK, DG ;
BALIS, FM .
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 1994, 18 (11) :805-810
[2]  
BENE MC, 1995, LEUKEMIA, V9, P1783
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thiopurines in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6-thioguanine versus 6-mercaptopurine [J].
Erb, N ;
Harms, DO ;
Janka-Schaub, G .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 42 (04) :266-272
[5]   Co-operative study group for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (COALL): long-term follow-up of trials 82, 85, 89 and 92 [J].
Harms, DO ;
Janka-Schaub, GE .
LEUKEMIA, 2000, 14 (12) :2234-2239
[6]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[7]   VARIABLE MERCAPTOPURINE METABOLISM AND TREATMENT OUTCOME IN CHILDHOOD LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
LENNARD, L ;
LILLEYMAN, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (12) :1816-1823
[8]   CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA - A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTRACELLULAR 6-MERCAPTOPURINE METABOLITES AND NEUTROPENIA [J].
LENNARD, L ;
REES, CA ;
LILLEYMAN, JS ;
MADDOCKS, JL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 16 (04) :359-363
[9]   MERCAPTOPURINE METABOLISM AND RISK OF RELAPSE IN CHILDHOOD LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
LILLEYMAN, JS ;
LENNARD, L .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8907) :1188-1190
[10]  
NELSON JA, 1975, CANCER RES, V35, P2872