Fuzzy ranking for concept evaluation in configuration design for mass customization

被引:39
作者
Jiao, JX [1 ]
Tseng, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Engn Management, Clear Water Bay Rd, Kowloon, Peoples R China
来源
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS | 1998年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
fuzzy ranking; configuration analysis; multicriteria decision making; selection problem; mass customization; information content; engineering design; performance evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/1063293X9800600303
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Aiming at configuration design for mass customization, this paper develops a fuzzy ranking methodology for concept evaluation. The fuzzy preference relation is applied to modeling the fuzziness on the level of a single criterion as well as on a global level. The ranking approach integrates linguistic terms and fuzzy numbers into the fuzzy preference model so as to characterize both intangible and tangible criteria. In addition, the information content is employed to synchronize diverse measures of design criteria into a common metric and connect customer satisfaction to the technical capabilities of a design. Moreover, the fuzzy line segment is employed to fuzzify the crisp measurements of tangible criteria in order to be compatible with the universe of discourse defined for the intangible criteria. Furthermore, a more rigorous procedure for determining subjective customer preferences, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process, is applied to the fuzzy analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 206
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
AGOGINO AM, 1989, NSF ENG DES RES C U
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Research in Engineering Design, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01581343
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[4]   ROUTINE DESIGN WITH INFORMATION-CONTENT AND FUZZY QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT [J].
BAHRAMI, A .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 1994, 5 (04) :203-210
[5]   From fuzzy input requirements to crisp design [J].
Bahrami, Ali ;
Dagli, Cihan H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 8 (01) :52-60
[6]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[7]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[8]   FUZZING RATINGS FOR MULTIATTRIBUTE DESIGN DECISION-MAKING [J].
CARNAHAN, JV ;
THURSTON, DL ;
LIU, T .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1994, 116 (02) :511-521
[9]   RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS WITH MAXIMIZING SET AND MINIMIZING SET [J].
CHEN, SH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (02) :113-129
[10]  
CLAUSING D, 1994, TOTAL QUALITY DEV ST