Policy analysis of the conversion of histamine(2) antagonists to over-the-counter use

被引:17
作者
Kalish, SC
Bohn, RL
Avorn, J
机构
[1] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DEPT MED, DIV GERONTOL, PROGRAM ANAL CLIN STRATEGIES, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, GERIATR RES & TRAINING CTR, BOSTON, MA USA
关键词
histamine antagonists; economic analyses; over-the-counter medications;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199701000-00003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The authors assess the costs associated with treatment of dyspepsia with histamine(2) antagonists versus without availability of over-the-counter (OTC). METHODS. A cost analysis was performed using a decision-analysis model. Patients with an initial episode of dyspepsia were studied. The model includes casts associated with consumption of OTC and prescription and medications for dyspepsia, physician visits and associated diagnostic testing, time spent for physician visits and diagnostic tests, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS. The model is sensitive to the relative cost of histamine(2) antagonists when purchased Rx or QTC, as well as to the efficacy of these drugs in relieving dyspeptic symptoms. For patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (the largest group of likely consumers), the model demonstrates a cost savings if the OTC cost of the medication is slightly less than one third the Rx cost, Costs are similar whether or not histamine(2) antagonists are available OTC, If the symptom relief efficacies of histamine(2) antagonists are equivalent whether purchased by prescription only or OTC, then the health-care expenditures for a typical patient with dyspepsia are $204 for OTC availability and $203 for Rx-only use, Viewing costs from the perspective of a managed-care organization, expenditures for an episode of dyspepsia are $149 regardless of whether or not histamine(2) antagonists are available OTC. Restricting the analysis to patients with underlying nonulcer dyspepsia yields similar results, Variation of numerous assumptions and probabilities other than histamine antagonist cost and efficacy, including costs associated with physician visits and diagnostic tests, and the likelihood of seeking medical care, do not substantially affect the results of the model. CONCLUSIONS. Health-care tests associated with initial treatment of dyspepsia are similar regardless of the availability of histamine(2) antagonists OTC. This is due largely to the similar efficacy of these drugs compared with antacids and the predicted increase in diagnostic testing that may result if a patient visits a physician after failure to achieve symptom relief with OTC use of histamine(2) antagonists.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
*AM MED ASS, 1993, MED RBRVS PHYS GUID
[2]   SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF THE OVER-THE-COUNTER AVAILABILITY OF H-2-ANTAGONISTS [J].
ANDERSEN, M ;
SCHOU, JS .
DRUG SAFETY, 1993, 8 (03) :179-185
[3]  
BADER JP, 1977, CIMETIDINE
[4]  
BARDHAN KD, 1978, WESTM HOSP S 1978
[5]   STUDY OF DYSPEPSIA IN A GENERAL-PRACTICE AS ASSESSED BY ENDOSCOPY AND RADIOLOGY [J].
BARNES, RJ ;
GEAR, MWL ;
NICOL, A ;
DEW, AB .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 4 (5938) :214-216
[6]   GASTRIC-ULCER HEALING WITH RANITIDINE AND CIMETIDINE - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
BARON, JH ;
PERRIN, VL .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1983, 18 (07) :973-976
[7]   COMPARISON OF RANITIDINE AND CIMETIDINE IN DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING [J].
BARR, GD ;
PARIS, CH ;
MIDDLETON, WRJ ;
PIPER, DW .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1982, 2 (02) :83-85
[8]  
BECKER U, 1987, ACTA MED SCAND, V221, P95
[9]  
BEZUIDENHOUT DJJ, 1984, S AFR MED J, V65, P1007
[10]   PATTERNS OF CARE AND EXPENDITURES BY CALIFORNIA MEDICAID FOR PEPTIC-ULCER AND OTHER ACID-RELATED DISEASES [J].
BLOOM, BS ;
FOX, NA ;
JACOBS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 11 (06) :615-620