Validity of four pain intensity rating scales

被引:1376
作者
Ferreira-Valente, Maria Alexandra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pais-Ribeiro, Jose Luis [1 ,3 ]
Jensen, Mark P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Psicol & Ciencias Educ, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Portuguese Fdn Sci & Technol, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Psychol & Hlth Unit, Unidade Invest Psicol & Saude, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Pain assessment; Validity; Numerical Rating Scale; Visual Analogue Scale; Faces Pain Scale; Verbal Rating Scale; COLD PRESSOR TEST; VISUAL ANALOG; PROSTATE-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; RELIABILITY; CHILDREN; RESPONSIVENESS; TEMPERATURE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) are among the most commonly used measures of pain intensity in clinical and research settings. Although evidence supports their validity as measures of pain intensity, few studies have compared them with respect to the critical validity criteria of responsivity, and no experiment has directly compared all 4 measures in the same study. The current study compared the relative validity of VAS, NRS, VRS, and FPS-R for detecting differences in painful stimulus intensity and differences between men and women in response to experimentally induced pain. One hundred twenty-seven subjects underwent four 20-second cold pressor trials with temperature order counterbalanced across 1 degrees C, 3 degrees C, 5 degrees C, and 7 degrees C and rated pain intensity using all 4 scales. Results showed statistically significant differences in pain intensity between temperatures for each scale, with lower temperatures resulting in higher pain intensity. The order of responsivity was as follows: NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R. However, there were relatively small differences in the responsivity between scales. A statistically significant sex main effect was also found for the NRS, VRS, and FPS-R. The findings are consistent with previous studies supporting the validity of each scale. The most support emerged for the NRS as being both (1) most responsive and (2) able to detect sex differences in pain intensity. The results also provide support for the validity of the scales for use in Portuguese samples. (C) 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2399 / 2404
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
[2]  
Arantes S., 2007, Dor, V15, P22
[3]  
BATALHA L, INSTRUCTIONS ADM FAC
[4]   An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients [J].
Bergh, I ;
Sjöström, B ;
Odén, A ;
Steen, B .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (05) :380-387
[5]   THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES [J].
BIERI, D ;
REEVE, RA ;
CHAMPION, GD ;
ADDICOAT, L ;
ZIEGLER, JB .
PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) :139-150
[6]  
Bolton JE, 1998, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V21, P1
[7]   Gabapentin in postamputation phantom limb pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study [J].
Bone, M ;
Critchley, P ;
Buggy, DJ .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (05) :481-486
[8]   SOME THEOREMS ON QUADRATIC FORMS APPLIED IN THE STUDY OF ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE PROBLEMS .2. EFFECTS OF INEQUALITY OF VARIANCE AND OF CORRELATION BETWEEN ERRORS IN THE 2-WAY CLASSIFICATION [J].
BOX, GEP .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1954, 25 (03) :484-498
[9]   A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J].
Breivik, EK ;
Björnsson, GA ;
Skovlund, E .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) :22-28
[10]   From the 2006 NIDRR SCI measures meeting - Pain after spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research [J].
Bryce, Thomas N. ;
Norrbrink, Cecilia ;
Cardenas, Diana D. ;
Dijkers, Marcel ;
Felix, Elizabeth R. ;
Finnerup, Nanna B. ;
Kennedy, Paul ;
Lundeberg, Thomas ;
Richards, J. Scott ;
Rintala, Diana H. ;
Siddall, Philip ;
Widerstrom-Noga, Eva .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2007, 30 (05) :421-440