Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective

被引:523
作者
Patrick, Donald L.
Burke, Laurie B.
Powers, John H.
Scott, Jane A.
Rock, Edwin P.
Dawisha, Sahar
O'Neill, Robert
Kennedy, Dianne L.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle Qual Life Grp, Special Gov Employee Food & Drug Adm, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off New Drugs, Study Endpoionts & Label Dev Team, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] NIAID, Sci Applicat Int Corp, Natl Inst Hlth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] GSK Biol, Collegeville, PA USA
[5] US FDA, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Div Gen Restorat & Neurol Devices, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[6] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Biostat, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
clinical trials; FDA; patient-reported outcomes; PRO; QOL; statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article concerns development and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials to evaluate medical products. A PRO is any report coming directly from patients, without interpretation by physicians or others, about how they function or feel in relation to a health condition and its therapy. PRO instruments are used to measure these patient reports. PROs provide a unique perspective on medical therapy, because some effects of a health condition and its therapy are known only to patients. Properly developed and evaluated PRO instruments also have the potential to provide more sensitive and specific measurements of the effects of medical therapies, thereby increasing the efficiency of clinical trials that attempt to measure the meaningful treatment benefits of those therapies. Poorly developed andevaluated instruments may provide misleading conclusions or data that cannot be used to support product labeling claims. We review selected major challenges from Food and Drug Administration's perspective in using PRO instruments, measures, and end points to support treatment benefit claims in product labeling. These challenges highlight the need for sponsors to formulate desired labeling claim(s) prospectively, to acquire and document information needed to support these claim(s), and to identify existing instruments or develop new and more appropriate PRO instruments for evaluating treatment benefit in the defined population in which they will seek claims.
引用
收藏
页码:S125 / S137
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[2]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
[3]  
DELASKO JM, 2005, TARGET PRODUCT PROFI, P36
[4]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, POINTS CONS MULT ISS
[5]  
Fairclough DL, 2002, Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials
[6]  
Fayers P.M., 2007, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
[7]   What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? [J].
Frost, Marlene H. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Liepa, Astra M. ;
Stauffer, Joseph W. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 :S94-S105
[8]  
Groves R. M., 2004, SURV METHODOL
[9]   Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials [J].
Guyatt, GH ;
Juniper, EF ;
Walter, SD ;
Griffith, LE ;
Goldstein, RS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7132) :690-693
[10]  
Patrick DL., 1993, Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation