Twins and the study of rater (Dis)agreement

被引:65
作者
Bartels, Meike [1 ]
Boomsma, Dorret I. [1 ]
Hudziak, James J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Beijsterveldt, Toos C. E. M. [1 ]
van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Div Human Genet, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Div Human Genet, Dept Med, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Ctr Children Youth & Families, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Virginia Inst Psychiat & Behav Genet, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Virginia Inst Psychiat & Behav Genet, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
twin studies; rater bias; developmental psychology; structural equation modeling;
D O I
10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.451
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Genetically informative data can be used to address fundamental questions concerning the measurement of behavior in children. The authors illustrate this with longitudinal multiple-rater data on internalizing problems in twins. Valid information on the behavior of a child is obtained for behavior that multiple raters agree upon and for rater-specific perception of the child's behavior. Rater-disagreement variance sigma(2)(rd) accounted for 35% of the individual differences in internalizing behavior. Up to 17% of this sigma(2)(rd) was accounted for by rater-specific additive genetic variance sigma 2(A(u)). Thus, the disagreement should not be considered only to be bias/error but also as representing the unique feature of the relationships between that parent and the child. The longitudinal extension of this model helps to make a distinction between measurement error and the raters' unique perception of the child's behavior. For internalizing behavior, the results show large stability across time, which is accounted for by common additive genetic and common shared environmental factors. Rater-specific shared environmental factors show substantial influence on stability. This could mean that rater bias may be persistent and affect longitudinal studies.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 466
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Achenbach T.M., 1992, Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist/2-3 and 1992 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T. M., 1991, Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and the TRF profiles
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BEHAV GENETICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, The dependability of behaviourial measurements: Theory of generalzsability for scores and profiles
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIAT, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470854871.CHXIII
[6]   Disentangling genetic, environmental, and rater effects on internalizing and externalizing problem behavior in 10-year-old twins [J].
Bartels, M ;
Boomsma, DI ;
Hudziak, JJ ;
Rietveld, MJH ;
van Beijsterveldt, TCEM ;
van den Oord, EJCG .
TWIN RESEARCH, 2004, 7 (02) :162-175
[7]   A study of parent ratings of internalizing and externalizing problem behavior in 12-year-old twins [J].
Bartels, M ;
Hudziak, JJ ;
Boomsma, DI ;
Rietveld, MJH ;
Van Beijsterveldt, TCEM ;
Van den Oord, EJCG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 42 (11) :1351-1359
[8]   Young Netherlands Twin Register (Y-NTR): A longitudinal multiple informant study of problem behavior [J].
Bartels, Meike ;
van Beijsterveldtl, C. E. M. ;
Derks, Eske M. ;
Stroet, Therese M. ;
Polderman, Tinca J. C. ;
Hudziak, James J. ;
Boomsma, Dorret I. .
TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 10 (01) :3-11
[9]   Netherlands Twin Register: From twins to twin families [J].
Boomsma, Dorret I. ;
de Geus, Eco J. C. ;
Vink, Jacqueline M. ;
Stubbe, Janine H. ;
Distel, Marijn A. ;
Hottenga, Jouke-Jan ;
Posthuma, Danielle ;
van Beijsterveldt, Toos C. E. M. ;
Hudziak, James J. ;
Bartels, Meike ;
Willemsen, Gonneke .
TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2006, 9 (06) :849-857
[10]   Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adult twins [J].
Borkenau, P ;
Riemann, R ;
Angleitner, A ;
Spinath, FM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) :655-668