Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation?

被引:663
作者
Hanley, N [1 ]
Mourato, S
Wright, RE
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] CEPR, Bonn, Germany
[5] ISL, Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-6419.00145
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine some popular 'choice modelling' approaches to environmental valuation, which can be considered as alternatives to more familiar valuation techniques based on stated preferences such as the contingent valuation method. A number of choice modelling methods are consistent with consumer theory, their focus on an attribute-based theory of value permits a superior representation of many environmental management contexts. However, choice modelling surveys can place a severe cognitive burden upon respondents and induce satisficing rather than maximising behavioural patterns. In this framework, we seek to identify the best available choice modelling alternative and investigate its potential to 'solve' some of the major biases associated with standard contingent valuation. We then discuss its use in the light of policy appraisal needs within the EU. An application to the demand for rock climbing in Scotland is provided as an illustration.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 462
页数:28
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Adamowicz W, 1998, INTRO ATTRIBUTE BASE
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTINGENT VALUATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], J POLITICAL EC
[4]  
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4602
[5]  
BEGGS S, 1981, J ECONOMETRICS, V16, P1
[6]   ANALYSIS OF THE RELIABILITY OF PREFERENCE RANKING DATA [J].
BENAKIVA, M ;
MORIKAWA, T ;
SHIROISHI, F .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1991, 23 (03) :253-268
[7]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[8]  
CARLSSON F, 1999, EC STUDIES, V90
[9]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[10]  
Carson R.T., 1999, 9 ANN C EUR ASS ENV