A Bayesian approach to testing decision making axioms

被引:60
作者
Myung, JI
Karabatsos, G
Iverson, GJ
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2005.02.004
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Theories of decision making are often formulated in terms of deterministic axioms, which do not account for stochastic variation that attends empirical data. This study presents a Bayesian inference framework for dealing with fallible data. The Bayesian framework provides readily applicable statistical procedures addressing typical inference questions that arise when algebraic axioms are tested against empirical data. The key idea of the Bayesian framework is to employ a prior distribution representing the parametric order constraints implied by a given axiom. Modern methods of Bayesian computation such as Markov chain Monte Carlo are used to estimate the posterior distribution, which provides the information that allows an axiom to be evaluated. Specifically, we adopt the Bayesian p-value as the criterion to assess the descriptive adequacy of a given model (axiom) and we use the deviance information criterion (DIC) to select among a set of candidate models. We illustrate the Bayesian framework by testing well-known axioms of decision making, including the axioms of monotonicity of joint receipt and stochastic transitivity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 225
页数:21
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15]
[2]   A new perspective on priors for generalized linear models [J].
Bedrick, EJ ;
Christensen, R ;
Johnson, W .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (436) :1450-1460
[3]   Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet [J].
Birnbaum, MH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (05) :399-407
[6]   Which error story is best? [J].
Carbone, E ;
Hey, JD .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2000, 20 (02) :161-176
[7]   EXPLAINING THE GIBBS SAMPLER [J].
CASELLA, G ;
GEORGE, EI .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) :167-174
[8]   TESTS OF ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE JOINT RECEIPT OF GAMBLES IN RANK-DEPENDENT AND SIGN-DEPENDENT UTILITY-THEORY [J].
CHO, Y ;
LUCE, RD ;
VONWINTERFELDT, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (05) :931-943
[9]   Tests of hypotheses about certainty equivalents and joint receipt of gambles [J].
Cho, YH ;
Luce, RD .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 64 (03) :229-248
[10]   Receiving two consequences: Tests of monotonicity and scale invariance [J].
Cho, YH ;
Fisher, GR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 83 (01) :61-81