Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics

被引:250
作者
Chen, Yu-Chun [1 ]
Yeh, Hsiao-Yun [2 ]
Wu, Jau-Ching [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Haschler, Ingo [1 ]
Chen, Tzeng-Ji [2 ,6 ]
Wetter, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Med Informat, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Family Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Hosp & Hlth Care Adm, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Administrative health care database; National Health Insurance Research Database; Bibliometric analysis; Knowledge growth; SECONDARY DATA SOURCES; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH; GROWTH; PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
The trend to use administrative health care databases as research material is increasing but not well explored. Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), one of the largest administrative health care databases around the world, has been used widely in academic studies. This study analyzed 383 NHIRD studies published between 2000 and 2009 to quantify the effects on overall growth, scholar response, and spread of the study fields. The NHIRD studies expanded rapidly in both quantity and quality since the first study was published in 2000. Researchers usually collaborated to share knowledge, which was crucial to process the NHIRD data. However, once the fundamental problem had been overcome, success to get published became more reproducible. NHIRD studies were also published diversely in a growing number of journals. Both general health and clinical science studies benefited from NIIIRD. In conclusion, this new research material widely promotes scientific production in a greater magnitude. The experience of Taiwan's NHIRD should encourage national- or institutional-level data holders to consider re-using their administrative databases for academic purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 380
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report-Part I [J].
Berger, Marc L. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad ;
Atkins, David ;
Johnson, Michael L. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) :1044-1052
[2]
Chen Tzeng-Ji, 2007, J Chin Med Assoc, V70, P110
[3]
Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH [J].
DeShazo, Jonathan P. ;
LaVallie, Donna L. ;
Wolf, Fredric M. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 9
[4]
Collecting And Sharing Data For Population Health: A New Paradigm [J].
Diamond, Carol C. ;
Mostashari, Farzad ;
Shirky, Clay .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (02) :454-466
[5]
Egghe L, 2005, LIBR INFORM SCI SER, P1
[6]
Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth:: An overview [J].
Fernández-Cano, A ;
Torralbo, M ;
Vallejo, M .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 61 (03) :301-321
[7]
Modelling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics [J].
Gupta, BM ;
Karisiddappa, CR .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2000, 49 (02) :321-355
[8]
Using Secondary Data Sources for Pharmacoepidemiology and Outcomes Research [J].
Harpe, Spencer E. .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 29 (02) :138-153
[9]
HAYES RM, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC