Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California

被引:254
作者
Gerstenberger, MC
Wiemer, S
Jones, LM
Reasenberg, PA
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Pasadena, CA 91106 USA
[2] ETH, Inst Geophys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature03622
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite a lack of reliable deterministic earthquake precursors, seismologists have significant predictive information about earthquake activity from an increasingly accurate understanding of the clustering properties of earthquakes(1-4). In the past 15 years, time-dependent earthquake probabilities based on a generic short-term clustering model have been made publicly available in near-real time during major earthquake sequences. These forecasts describe the probability and number of events that are, on average, likely to occur following a mainshock of a given magnitude, but are not tailored to the particular sequence at hand and contain no information about the likely locations of the aftershocks. Our model builds upon the basic principles of this generic forecast model in two ways: it recasts the forecast in terms of the probability of strong ground shaking, and it combines an existing time-independent earthquake occurrence model based on fault data and historical earthquakes(5) with increasingly complex models describing the local time-dependent earthquake clustering(1,2). The result is a time-dependent map showing the probability of strong shaking anywhere in California within the next 24 hours. The seismic hazard modelling approach we describe provides a better understanding of time-dependent earthquake hazard, and increases its usefulness for the public, emergency planners and the media.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 331
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Boore D.M., 1997, Seismol. Res. Lett, V68, P128, DOI DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.68.1.128
[2]  
Burnham K.P., 2002, Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, V172, P488, DOI [DOI 10.1007/B97636, 10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7]
[3]   A common origin for aftershocks, foreshocks, and multiplets [J].
Felzer, KR ;
Abercrombie, RE ;
Ekström, G .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 94 (01) :88-98
[4]  
Frankel A, 1996, Open-File Report, P96
[5]   Earthquake prediction: a critical review [J].
Geller, RJ .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 131 (03) :425-450
[6]  
Gutenberg B, 1954, ANN GEOF, V9, P1
[7]   Subcritical and supercritical regimes in epidemic models of earthquake aftershocks [J].
Helmstetter, A ;
Sornette, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2002, 107 (B10)
[8]   EARTHQUAKE AFTERSHOCKS - UPDATE [J].
REASENBERG, PA ;
JONES, LM .
SCIENCE, 1994, 265 (5176) :1251-1252
[9]   Foreshock occurrence before large earthquakes [J].
Reasenberg, PA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B3) :4755-4768
[10]   EARTHQUAKE HAZARD AFTER A MAINSHOCK IN CALIFORNIA [J].
REASENBERG, PA ;
JONES, LM .
SCIENCE, 1989, 243 (4895) :1173-1176