Multiple-bounded uncertainty choice data as probabilistic intentions

被引:49
作者
Evans, MF [1 ]
Flores, NE
Boyle, KJ
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Econ, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Econ, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Maine, Dept Resource Econ & Policy, Orono, ME 04469 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3147299
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The multiple-bounded uncertainty choice (MBUC) value elicitation method allows respondents to indicate qualitative levels of uncertainty, as opposed to a simple yes or no, across a range of prices. We argue that MBUC responses convey subjective probabilities. We examine the decision process of the researcher faced with estimating population parameters from MBUC sample responses. We develop her optimal decision rule based on a specified loss function. The resulting estimator accommodates uncertainty on the part of the respondent and the researcher. We illustrate the proposed estimation method using MBUC responses from the first field application of this elicitation format. The resulting framework produces stable estimates and nests alternative methods of modeling MBUC responses.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 560
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty [J].
Alberini, A ;
Boyle, K ;
Welsh, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (01) :40-62
[2]  
ALBERINI A, 1998, W 133 M COL SPRINGS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1950, STAT DECISION FUNCTI
[4]   Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: Fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty [J].
Berrens, RP ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Bohara, AK ;
Silva, CL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (01) :144-168
[5]   HOW PROBABLE IS PROBABLE - A NUMERICAL TRANSLATION OF VERBAL PROBABILITY-EXPRESSIONS [J].
BEYTHMAROM, R .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (03) :257-269
[6]   Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same? [J].
Cameron, TA ;
Poe, GL ;
Ethier, RG ;
Schulze, WD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (03) :391-425
[7]   Referendum design and contingent valuation: The NOAA panel's no-vote recommendation (vol 80, pg 335, 1998) [J].
Carson, RT ;
Hanemann, WM ;
Kopp, RJ ;
Krosnick, JA ;
Mitchell, RC ;
Presser, S ;
Ruud, PA ;
Smith, VK ;
Conaway, M ;
Martin, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (03) :484-487
[8]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[9]   VERBAL VERSUS NUMERICAL PROBABILITIES - EFFICIENCY, BIASES, AND THE PREFERENCE PARADOX [J].
EREV, I ;
COHEN, BL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 45 (01) :1-18
[10]  
Flannelly KJ, 1998, J MARKET RES SOC, V40, P337