Monophyly, paraphyly, and natural kinds

被引:30
作者
Rieppel, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Field Museum Nat Hist, Dept Geol, Chicago, IL 60605 USA
关键词
classes; individuals; monophyly; natural kinds; paraphyly;
D O I
10.1007/s10539-004-0679-z
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
A long-standing debate has dominated systematic biology and the ontological commitments made by its theories. The debate has contrasted individuals and the part - whole relationship with classes and the membership relation. This essay proposes to conceptualize the hierarchy of higher taxa is terms of a hierarchy of homeostatic property cluster natural kinds (biological species remain largely excluded from the present discussion). The reference of natural kind terms that apply to supraspecific taxa is initially fixed descriptively; the extension of those natural kind terms is subsequently established by empirical investigation. In that sense, classification precedes generalization, and description provides guidance to empirical investigation. The reconstruction of a hierarchy of (homeostatic property cluster) natural kinds is discussed in the light of cladistic methods of phylogeny reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 487
页数:23
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
ALBERCH P, 1980, AM ZOOL, V20, P653
[2]  
ALBERCH P, 1989, GEOBIOS, V12, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0016-6995(89)80006-3
[3]  
Alberch P., 1982, Evolution and development, V22, P313, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-45532-2_15
[4]  
[Anonymous], GRUE NEW RIDDLE INDU
[5]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS BIOL TODAY
[6]  
[Anonymous], PHYLOCODE PHYLOGENET
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, DEV BIOL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MISTAKEN EXTINCTION
[9]  
Ax P., 1984, P1
[10]  
Barton N.H., 1989, P229