Application of an in vivo swine model for the determination of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated vegetables

被引:46
作者
Juhasz, Albert L. [1 ]
Smith, Euan [1 ]
Weber, John [1 ]
Rees, Matthew [2 ]
Rofe, Allan [2 ]
Kuchel, Tim [2 ]
Sansom, Lloyd [3 ]
Naidu, Ravi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ctr Environm Risk Assessment & Remediat, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Inst Med & Vet Sci, Frome Rd, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Univ S Australia, Div Hlth Sci, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Sansom Inst, City E Campus, SA 5001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
arsenic; bioavailability; in vivo; risk assessment; vegetables;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Considerable information is available in the literature regarding the uptake of arsenic (As) from contaminated soil and irrigation water by vegetables. However, few studies have investigated As speciation in these crops while a dearth of information is available on As bioavailability following their consumption. In this study, the concentration and speciation of As in chard, radish, lettuce and mung beans was determined following hydroponic growth of the vegetables using As-contaminated water. In addition, As bioavailability was assessed using an in vivo swine feeding assay. While As concentrations ranged from 3.0 to 84.2 mg As kg(-1) (dry weight), only inorganic As (arsenite and arsenate) was detected in the edible portions of the vegetables. When As bioavailability was assessed through monitoring blood plasma As concentrations following swine consumption of As-contaminated vegetables, between 50% and 100% of the administered As dose was absorbed and entered systemic circulation. Arsenic bioavailability decreased in the order mung beans > radish > lettuce = chard. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Arsenic accumulation and metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J].
Abedin, MJ ;
Cresser, MS ;
Meharg, AA ;
Feldmann, J ;
Cotter-Howells, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (05) :962-968
[2]  
*AG TECHN, 2006, 59880533EN AG TECHN
[3]   Speciation of arsenic in ground water samples: A comparative study of CE-UV HG-AAS and LC-ICP-MS [J].
Akter, KF ;
Chen, Z ;
Smith, L ;
Davey, D ;
Naidu, R .
TALANTA, 2005, 68 (02) :406-415
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
Bain S A, 1991, J Invest Surg, V4, P103
[6]   Effects of compost and phosphate on plant arsenic accumulation from soils near pressure-treated wood [J].
Cao, XD ;
Ma, LQ .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2004, 132 (03) :435-442
[7]  
Casteel S.W., 1997, 450088AORH US EPA
[8]   ARSENIC SPECIATION IN THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
CULLEN, WR ;
REIMER, KJ .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1989, 89 (04) :713-764
[9]   REDUCTION AND BINDING OF ARSENATE AND DIMETHYLARSINATE BY GLUTATHIONE - A MAGNETIC-RESONANCE STUDY [J].
DELNOMDEDIEU, M ;
BASTI, MM ;
OTVOS, JD ;
THOMAS, DJ .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 1994, 90 (02) :139-155
[10]   Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils [J].
Juhasz, Albert L. ;
Smith, Euan ;
Weber, John ;
Rees, Matthew ;
Rofe, Allan ;
Kuchel, Tim ;
Sansom, Lloyd ;
Naidu, Ravi .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 69 (06) :961-966