New Voters, New Outlook? Predispositions, Social Networks, and the Changing Politics of Gay Civil Rights

被引:35
作者
Becker, Amy B. [1 ]
Scheufele, Dietram A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Towson Univ, Dept Mass Commun & Commun Studies, Towson, MD 21252 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
关键词
2004; PRESIDENTIAL-ELECTION; STEM-CELL RESEARCH; SAME-SEX MARRIAGE; PARTICIPATION; TOLERANCE; VALUES; REALIGNMENT; ELECTORATE; ATTITUDES; CONTACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00771.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study examines the factors that shape public acceptance of homosexuality and support for same-sex marriage across age cohorts. Methods We analyzed data from two national surveys. We constructed hierarchical logistic and hierarchical ordinary least squares regressions for relevant age cohorts in order to test our hypotheses and explore our research questions. Results Our models suggest that personal contact has a greater impact on the attitudes of younger respondents, positively influencing public acceptance of homosexuality. Alternatively, religious and ideological predispositions have a greater impact on the attitudes of older individuals. When examining public support for gay marriage, we find that younger individuals have higher levels of deliberative engagement with the issue debate, while older individuals rely more heavily on their predispositions when determining issue stance. Interestingly, measures of media exposure are not significantly related to either public acceptance of homosexuality or support for same-sex marriage, suggesting that other factors may have a greater impact on public attitudes at this point in time. Conclusion The implications of these findings are discussed in light of the emergence of a new political generation and the continuing struggle for gay civil rights.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 345
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Ideological realignment in the US electorate [J].
Abramowitz, AI ;
Saunders, KL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1998, 60 (03) :634-652
[2]   Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Saunders, Kyle L. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2006, 59 (02) :175-187
[3]  
Allport G. W., 1954, READING ADDISON WESL
[4]  
Altemeyer B., 1988, Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1960, OPEN CLOSED MIND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, US RELIG LANDSCAPE S
[7]   SOUTHERN (DIS)COMFORT: SEXUAL PREJUDICE AND CONTACT WITH GAY MEN AND LESBIANS IN THE SOUTH [J].
Baunach, Dawn M. ;
Burgess, Elisabeth O. ;
Muse, Courtney S. .
SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 2010, 30 (01) :30-64
[8]  
Beatty KathleenMurphy., 1984, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V48, P318, DOI DOI 10.1093/POQ/48.1B.318
[9]   Getting Citizens Involved: How Controversial Policy Debates Stimulate Issue Participation during a Political Campaign [J].
Becker, Amy B. ;
Dalrymple, Kajsa E. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Gunther, Albert C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2010, 22 (02) :181-203
[10]   Moral Politicking Public Attitudes toward Gay Marriage in an Election Context [J].
Becker, Amy B. ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2009, 14 (02) :186-211