A three-dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis

被引:37
作者
Ahmad, S. S. [1 ]
Simonovic, S. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Delcan Corp, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2011年 / 4卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Flooding; fuzzy set; reliability; risk; space; three-dimensional fuzzy set; time; uncertainty; DECISION-MAKING; WATER-RESOURCES; UNCERTAINTY; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01090.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a methodology for assessing spatial and temporal uncertainty associated with flood risk management. Traditional modelling approaches focus on either temporal or spatial variability, but not both. There is a need to understand the dynamic characteristics of flood risk and its spatial variability. The traditional two-dimensional (2D) fuzzy set, with one dimension for the universe of discourse and the other dimension for its membership degree, is not sufficient to handle both, spatial and temporal variation of flood risk. The theoretical foundation of this study is based on the development of a three-dimensional (3D) fuzzy set that includes flood risk variability in space and time. The proposed methodology extends the acceptance level of partial flood damage concept to a 3D representation and allows capturing change of decision makers' preferences in time and space. The main objective of the paper is to present an original methodology for flood risk management that is capable of (a) addressing uncertainty caused by spatial and temporal variability and ambiguity; (b) integrating objective and subjective risks; and (c) assisting flood management decision making based on a more detailed understanding of temporal and spatial variability of risk. Presented methodology is illustrated using the Red River flood of 1997 (Manitoba, Canada) as a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 74
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ahmad S.S., 2007, Applied GIS, V3, P1
[2]   Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making [J].
Akter, T ;
Simonovic, SP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 77 (02) :133-143
[3]  
Ang H-S., 1984, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SUBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RISK AN UNC FLOOD DA
[6]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[7]   Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the neuse river watershed [J].
Borsuk, M ;
Clemen, R ;
Maguire, L ;
Reckhow, K .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (04) :355-373
[8]  
*DAN HYDR I, 2008, MIKE21 US MAN
[9]   Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources [J].
Despic, O ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :11-33
[10]   Fuzzy criteria for the evaluation of water resource systems performance [J].
El-Baroudy, I ;
Simonovic, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (10) :W105031-W1050310