Incentive effects, monitoring mechanisms and the market for corporate control: An analysis of the factors affecting public to private transactions in the UK

被引:59
作者
Weir, C
Laing, D
Wright, M
机构
[1] Robert Gordon Univ, Aberdeen Business Sch, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, Scotland
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Ctr Management buyout Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
public to private transactions; incentives; monitoring; market for corporate control;
D O I
10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00617.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the factors that influence the decision to change the status of a publicly quoted company to that of a private company. We find that firms that go private are more likely to have higher CEO ownership and higher institutional ownership. In relation to their board structures, firms going private tend to have more duality but there is no statistical difference in the proportion of non-executive directors. They do not show signs of having excess free cash flows but there is some evidence of lower growth opportunities. We do not find that firms going private experience a greater threat of hostile acquisition. The results are therefore consistent with incentive and monitoring explanations of going private. Calculation of the probability of going private shows that incentive effects are stronger than the monitoring effects.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 943
页数:35
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Amemiya Takeshi., 1985, Advanced Econometrics
[2]  
BAE SC, 2000, CHOOSING ORG FORM LE
[3]  
BURROWS A, 2002, MANAGEMENT BUYOU WIN
[4]  
Cadbury Committee, 1992, REP COMM FIN ASP COR
[5]  
*CMBOR, 2002, EUR BUYOUT REV
[6]  
*CMBOR, 2001, MAN BUY OUTS Q REV C
[7]  
COSSLET S, 1981, STRUCTURAL ANAL DISC
[8]  
DAHYA J, 1999, 61 ACCA
[9]   GOING PRIVATE - MINORITY FREEZEOUTS AND STOCKHOLDER WEALTH [J].
DEANGELO, H ;
DEANGELO, L ;
RICE, EM .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1984, 27 (02) :367-401
[10]   ORGANIZATIONAL FORM AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS KROGERS RECAPITALIZATION AND SAFEWAYS LBO [J].
DENIS, DJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 36 (02) :193-224