The development of the functional capacity index

被引:95
作者
MacKenzie, EJ
Damiano, A
Miller, T
Luchter, S
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,CTR INJURY RES & POLICY,BALTIMORE,MD
[2] HLTH TECHNOL ASSOCIATES INC,WASHINGTON,DC
[3] NATL PUBL SERV,RES INST,LANDOVER,MD
[4] NATL HIGHWAY TRAFF SAFETY ADM US,WASHINGTON,DC
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00005373-199611000-00006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: This paper describes the development of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) and compares it to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and the Injury Impairment Scale (IIS). Methods: The FCI maps 1990 AIS injury descriptions into scores that reflect expected levels of reduced functional capacity at 1 year after injury, Its development involved three steps, First, an expert clinical panel identified 10 relevant dimensions of function and defined Levels of capacity within each dimension, A group of 114 individuals then rated the relative severity of different levels of function in terms of their impact on daily living, The third step involved clinical experts assigning FCI scores to AIS '90 injury descriptions based on their knowledge of the likely 1-year consequences associated with each injury, As a first step in validating the FCI, 1 year postinjury levels of impairment (based on range of motion and strength) were correlated with FCI, IIS, and AIS scores derived for 301, patients with severe lower extremity fractures. Results: Consistency of FCI scores derived within and across dimensions of function argue for the conceptual integrity of the index, Non-zero FCI scores were assigned to only 26% of the 1,272 AIS injury descriptions, indicating that, for most of the injuries in the AIS dictionary, very little or no residual impairment is expected for the average person at 1 year. FCI scores derived for 301 patients with lower extremity fractures ranged from 0 to 63 (out of a possible 100 points), A modest correlation was found between FCI scores and actual levels of impairment observed at 1 year, Compared with the AIS and the IIS, the FCI appeared to discriminate somewhat better among different levels of function. Conclusions: Although further empirical validation of the FCI is essential before it can be broadly applied, its development represents an important first step in the generation of an AIS-based measure of expected functional outcome. Its validation is encouraged across a variety of settings and injury types.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 807
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] American Medical Association, 1988, GUID EV PERM IMP
  • [2] [Anonymous], J CHRONIC DIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1987, REHABILITATION OUTCO
  • [4] *ASS ADV AUT MED, 1991, 1990 ABBR INJ SCAL
  • [5] *ASS ADV AUT MED, 1994, INJ IMP SCAL 1994
  • [6] THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE
    BERGNER, M
    BOBBITT, RA
    CARTER, WB
    GILSON, BS
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) : 787 - 805
  • [7] WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS
    BOYD, NF
    SUTHERLAND, HJ
    HEASMAN, KZ
    TRITCHLER, DL
    CUMMINGS, BJ
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) : 58 - 67
  • [8] CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL VALUE OR UTILITY-BASED HEALTH INDEXES - THE USEFULNESS OF FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN PLANS
    CADMAN, D
    GOLDSMITH, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (08): : 643 - 651
  • [9] CARSTEN O, 1986, 8424 UMTRI U MICH TR
  • [10] CARTER WB, 1976, HEALTH SERV RES, V11, P516