High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review

被引:73
作者
Wei, Shu-Qin [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Zhong-Cheng [1 ]
Qi, Hui-Ping [2 ]
Xu, Hairong [1 ]
Fraser, William D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hop St Justine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[2] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Harbin, Peoples R China
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
active management; augmentation; oxytocin dose; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ACTIVE MANAGEMENT; CESAREAN-SECTION; DYSFUNCTIONAL LABOR; AMBULATION; MORBIDITY; INDUCTION; MORTALITY; DELIVERY; DOSAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation on the risk of cesarean section and on indicators of maternal and neonatal morbidity. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials published until January 2010. Ten randomized clinical trials, including 5423 women, met the inclusion criteria. High-dose oxytocin was associated with a moderate decrease in the risk of cesarean section (relative risk [RR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.97), a small increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12), and a decrease in labor duration (mean difference: -1.54 hours, 95% CI, -2.44 to -0.64). While hyperstimulation was increased with high-dose oxytocin (RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.49-2.45), there was no evidence of an increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity. We conclude that high-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation is associated with a decrease in cesarean section and shortened labor.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 304
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
[Anonymous], CONT REV OBSTET GYNA
[2]
A RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY OF OXYTOCIN AUGMENTATION OF LABOR .1. OBSTETRIC OUTCOME [J].
BIDGOOD, KA ;
STEER, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (06) :512-517
[3]
Dysfunctional labour: a randomised trial [J].
Blanch, G ;
Lavender, T ;
Walkinshaw, S ;
Alfirevic, Z .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (01) :117-120
[4]
EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT POLICIES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR [J].
BREART, G ;
MLIKACABANE, N ;
KAMINSKI, M ;
ALEXANDER, S ;
HERRUZONALDA, A ;
MANDRUZZATO, P ;
THORNTON, JG ;
TRAKAS, D .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 29 (1-3) :309-312
[5]
Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women [J].
Brown, Heather C. ;
Paranjothy, Shantini ;
Dowswell, Therese ;
Thomas, Jane .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04)
[6]
A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour [J].
Cammu, H ;
vanEeckhout, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (04) :313-318
[7]
Clark SL., 2009, Am J Obstet Gynecol, V200
[8]
Implementation of a conservative checklist- based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes [J].
Clark, Steven ;
Belfort, Michael ;
Saade, George ;
Hankins, Gary ;
Miller, Darla ;
Frye, Donna ;
Meyers, Janet .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (05) :480.e1-480.e5
[9]
Randomised controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for management of dystocia in first stage of labour [J].
Cluett, ER ;
Pickering, RM ;
Getliffe, K ;
Saunders, NJS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7435) :314-318
[10]
A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE AGGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT OF EARLY LABOR [J].
COHEN, GR ;
OBRIEN, WF ;
LEWIS, L ;
KNUPPEL, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (05) :1174-1177