Parental behaviour is unrelated to experimentally manipulated great tit brood sex ratio

被引:39
作者
Lessells, CM
Oddie, KR
Mateman, AC
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Ecol, Heteren, Netherlands
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Cell Anim & Populat Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1998.0763
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Parental investment may be biased with respect to parental sex or offspring sex or there may be an interaction between parental and offspring sex. We investigated whether any of these types of bias occurred in great tits, Parus major. By sexing chicks using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and subsequently moving chicks between broods, we were able to manipulate broods early in the nestling period to give all-male, mixed-sex and all-female broods. Provisioning behaviour (total feeding rate, proportion of feeding visits by the male, prey size, visit duration and proportion of visits in which a faecal sac was removed) was measured for broods aged 8-9 and 11-12 days. Nest defence behaviour was measured for 15-day-old broods. Parental weight, the occurrence of second broods and overwinter survival of the parents were also analysed, There were some differences in parental care between the parents: males made the majority of feeding visits and were more vigorous in nest defence. However, there was no evidence that parental care varied in relation to brood sex ratio. or that there was an interaction in parental tare between parental sex and brood sex ratio. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 393
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Comparison of survival estimates obtained from three different methods of recapture in the same population of the great tit [J].
Bauchau, V ;
VanNoordwijk, AJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 1995, 22 (5-6) :1031-1037
[2]   INBREEDING IN GREAT-TIT [J].
BULMER, MG .
HEREDITY, 1973, 30 (JUN) :313-325
[3]  
BURLEY N, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P1191, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05744.x
[4]   SEX-RATIO MANIPULATION AND SELECTION FOR ATTRACTIVENESS [J].
BURLEY, N .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4483) :721-722
[5]   THE DIFFERENTIAL-ALLOCATION HYPOTHESIS - AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST [J].
BURLEY, N .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 132 (05) :611-628
[6]   SEX-RATIO AND LOCAL RESOURCE COMPETITION IN A PROSIMIAN PRIMATE [J].
CLARK, AB .
SCIENCE, 1978, 201 (4351) :163-165
[7]   Mechanisms of facultative sex-ratio variation in Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata) [J].
Clotfelter, ED .
AUK, 1996, 113 (02) :441-449
[8]  
Crawley MJ., 1993, GLIM ECOLOGISTS
[9]   The ''file drawer problem'' of non-significant results: Does it apply to biological research? [J].
Csada, RD ;
James, PC ;
Espie, RHM .
OIKOS, 1996, 76 (03) :591-593
[10]   An evolutionary explanation for seasonal trends in avian sex ratios [J].
Daan, S ;
Dijkstra, C ;
Weissing, FJ .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) :426-430