Multicomponent Internet continuing medical education to promote chlamydia screening

被引:52
作者
Allison, JJ
Kiefe, CI
Wall, T
Casebeer, L
Ray, MN
Spettell, CM
Hook, EW
Oh, MK
Person, SD
Weissman, NW
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gen Internal Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Outcomes & Effectivness Res & Educ, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Continuing Med Educ, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pediat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Infect Dis, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[8] Aetna Integrated Informat Inc, Birmingham, AL USA
[9] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Background: Low Chlamydia trachomatis screening rates create an opportunity to test innovative continuing medical education (CME) programs. Few studies of Internet-based physician learning have been evaluated with objective data on practice patterns. Design: This randomized controlled trial tested a multicomponent Internet CME (mCME) intervention for increasing chlamydia screening of at-risk women aged 16 to 26 years. Setting: Eligible physician offices had >= 20 patients at risk for chlamydia as defined by the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS), had at least one primary care physician (internal medicine, family medicine/general practice, pediatrics) with Internet access, and participated in the study managed care organization. The 191 randomized primary care offices represented 20 states. Intervention: The intervention, available from February to December 2001, consisted of four case-based learning modules, was tailored in real time to each physician based on theory of behavior change, and included office-level feedback of chlamydia screening rates. Main outcome measures: HEDIS chlamydia screening rates for the pre-intervention (2000) and post-intervention (2002) periods. Results: Pre-intervention screening rates for the intervention and comparison offices were 18.9% and 16.2% (p =0.135). Post-intervention screening rates for the intervention and comparison offices were 15.5% and 12.4%, respectively (p =0.044, adjusting for baseline performance). Conclusions: The substantial decline in chlamydia screening rates observed in the comparison offices was significantly attenuated for the intervention offices. The mCME favorably influenced chlamydia screening by primary care physicians. (Am J Prev Med 2005;28 (3):285-290) (c) 2005 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
*ACCR COUNC CONT M, 2003, ACCME ANN REP DAT 20
[2]
[Anonymous], SELF DIRECTED LEARNI
[3]
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV
[4]
Bennett Nancy L, 2004, J Contin Educ Health Prof, V24, P31, DOI 10.1002/chp.1340240106
[5]
Beyer B., 1995, CONDUCT FORMATIVE EV
[6]
Asymptomatic sexually transmitted disease prevalence in four military populations:: Application of DNA amplification assays for Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening [J].
Brodine, SK ;
Shafer, MA ;
Shaffer, RA ;
Boyer, CE ;
Putnam, SD ;
Wignall, FS ;
Thomas, RJ ;
Bales, B ;
Schachter, J .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 178 (04) :1202-1204
[7]
Adolescent chlamydia testing practices and diagnosed infections in a large managed care organization [J].
Burstein, GR ;
Snyder, MH ;
Conley, D ;
Boekeloo, BO ;
Quinn, TC ;
Zenilman, JM .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2001, 28 (08) :477-483
[8]
Designing Tailored Web-Based Instruction to Improve Practicing Physicians' Preventive Practices [J].
Casebeer, Linda L. ;
Strasser, Sheryl M. ;
Spettell, Claire M. ;
Wall, Terry C. ;
Weissman, Norman ;
Ray, Midge N. ;
Allison, Jeroan J. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (03) :64-84
[9]
*CDCP, 2003, SEX TRANSM DIS SUR S
[10]
Childs James E., 1993, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V42, P1