Evaluation of natural gas supply options for south east and central Europe. Part 1: Indicator definitions and single indicator analysis

被引:16
作者
Afgan, Nalm H.
Carvalho, Maria G.
Pilavachi, Petros A.
Martins, Nelson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, P-3800 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] European Commiss, Bureau European Policy Advisers, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece
关键词
south east europe; natural gas routes; indicators; single criterion evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.022
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The need for diversification of energy sources is an immanent goal in long term energy strategy. In particular, this is of great importance for the natural gas supply. In this respect, evaluation and assessment of potential natural gas resources and their relation to consumers is of great importance. The natural gas supply in Europe is one of the main issues of European energy strategy to be followed in the future. In particular, the natural gas supply in the southeast countries is important. This paper provides a framework for understanding how much natural gas is available for use in south east and central Europe as well as the links to the recent supply of natural gas and its transport. The analysis is focused on evaluation of the potential routes for natural gas supply to the south east and central European countries. The potential options included in this analysis are the Yamal Route; Nabucco Route; West Balkan Route; LNG NEUM Route and Gas by Wire Route. In this analysis, attention is focused on the following indicators for assessment of potential options: environmental indicator; NG cost indicator; NG transport and royalty indicator; investment indicator: and NG demand indicator. The first part of this paper is devoted to the definition of the indicators and to single indicator analysis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2517 / 2524
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*ACCENT, 2005, METH EM PIP
[2]  
AFGAN NH, 2005, LNG TERMINAL NEUM
[3]  
BENCHMARK, 2003, NATURAL GAS INFOCOMM
[4]  
*EARTH TREND, 2003, EN RES BOSN HERZ
[5]  
*EU RUSS EN PARTN, 2002, PROS COMM INT
[6]  
FLEISCH T, 2000, TECHNOLOGIES GAS EC
[7]  
FLEISCH TH, 2000, TECHNOLOGY GAS EC EN
[8]  
GADOHHEEX P, 2002, EXPANDED ROLE LNG EU
[9]  
GALLISTL H, 2004, NATURAL GAS S EAST E
[10]  
GENNADY GV, 2002, ECOLOGICAL ASPECT PI