Objectives: Increasing numbers of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are being diagnosed. The aim of this paper is to define the fate of those patients undergoing surveillance of small AAAs. Setting: U.K. district general hospital. Methods: A prospective study! has been carried out of all patients undergoing surveillance. At the time of the first consultation the patient was assessed, a Detsky score calculated and the referral source noted. End points of the study were elective repair of the aneurysm, aneurysm rupture or death of the patient. Results: Details of 267 patients were analysed. The referral source was general practitioner in 39%, patients with peripheral vascular disease in 32% and department of urology in 21%. None were referred fi om population screening. The cumulative 5-year risks of rupture, elective repair or non-AAA related deaths were 15%, 26% and 46% for all patients, 4%, 13% and 38% for patients initially presenting with AAA less than 4 cm diameter and 21%, 42% and 54% for patients presenting with an AAA 4-5.5 cm diameter. All but one of II patients whose aneurysm ruptured were unfit or had declined elective repair. There were 56 non-AAA related deaths, the majority due to cardiovascular causes. Those patients with low Detsky scores had a 5-year survival of 62%, those with high scores 44%. The age/sex matched survival of a normal population at 5 years is 80%. Conclusion: Overall the non-AAA related mortality was greater Bran the risks of rupture or elective repair. It is important to bear in mind the poor prognosis of this group of patients compared with a normal population when considering elective repair of small AAAs.