A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota

被引:69
作者
Chambers, CM [1 ]
Whitehead, JC
机构
[1] Cent Missouri State Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Warrensburg, MO 64093 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Econ & Finance, Wilmington, NC 28401 USA
关键词
CVM; endangered species; willingness to pay;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026356020521
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
In this paper we estimate the willingness to pay for a wolf management plan and a wolf damage plan in Minnesota using the contingent valuation method. The theoretical definition of willingness to pay for wolf protection is composed of use and non-use values. We incorporate a don't know response option in the dichotomous choice valuation questions. A large number of respondents answered don't know. The multinomial logit model is used to differentiate between don't know and no responses. Non-use motives are important factors that explain willingness to pay. We use these benefit estimates in combination with two alternative cost estimates to consider the efficiency of the wolf management and damage plans. Both plans have estimated benefits greater than costs.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 267
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4602
[4]
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[5]
Referendum design and contingent valuation: The NOAA panel's no-vote recommendation (vol 80, pg 335, 1998) [J].
Carson, RT ;
Hanemann, WM ;
Kopp, RJ ;
Krosnick, JA ;
Mitchell, RC ;
Presser, S ;
Ruud, PA ;
Smith, VK ;
Conaway, M ;
Martin, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (03) :484-487
[6]
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[7]
Duffield JW, 1996, T N AM WILDL NAT RES, P285
[8]
Greene W.H., 1997, Econometric Analysis, V3rd ed.
[9]
Does don't know mean no? Analysis of 'don't know' responses in dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions [J].
Groothuis, PA ;
Whitehead, JC .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2002, 34 (15) :1935-1940
[10]
Haener M. K., 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V27, P218