Is small bowel biopsy necessary in adults with suspected celiac disease and IgA anti-endomysium antibodies? 100% positive predictive value for celiac disease in adults

被引:109
作者
Valdimarsson, T
Franzen, L
Grodzinsky, E
Skogh, T
Strom, M
机构
[1] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP,FAC HLTH SCI,DEPT INTERNAL MED,LINKOPING,SWEDEN
[2] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP,FAC HLTH SCI,DEPT PATHOL,LINKOPING,SWEDEN
[3] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP,FAC HLTH SCI,DEPT MICROBIOL IMMUNOL & INFECT DIS,LINKOPING,SWEDEN
关键词
celiac disease; IgA anti-endomysium antibodies; IgA anti-gliadin antibodies; small bowel biopsy;
D O I
10.1007/BF02208588
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The comparative diagnostic value of IgA anti-endomysium and IgA antigliadin antibodies in adults with histologically confirmed celiac disease is reported, Sera from 144 adult patients (without concurrent dermatitis herpetiformis or IgA deficiency) who underwent small bowel biopsy were analyzed for both IgA anti-endomysium and IgA anti-gliadin antibodies, Nineteen patients (13%) had celiac disease, The presence of IgA antiendomysium antibodies had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 100%, The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 96%, respectively, and the diagnostic accuracy was 97%, In contrast, IgA anti-gliadin antibodies had positive and negative predictive values of 28% and 96%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 71%. Based on these data, we suggest that small bowel biopsy is not necessary to diagnose celiac disease in symptomatic adults with IgA antiendomysium antibodies, Due to a negative predictive value of 96%, some symptomatic adults lacking anti-endomysium antibodies will not be correctly diagnosed without small bowel biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER JO, 1975, MAJOR PROBLEMS DERMA, V4, P236
[2]  
BARDELLA MT, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, P309
[3]  
Bayes T., 1763, PHILOS T R SOC LOND, V53, P370, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1763.0053
[4]  
BEUTNER EH, 1989, LANCET, V1, P1261
[5]   ANTIGLIADIN AND ANTIENDOMYSIUM ANTIBODY DETERMINATION FOR CELIAC-DISEASE [J].
BURGINWOLFF, A ;
GAZE, H ;
HADZISELIMOVIC, F ;
HUBER, H ;
LENTZE, MJ ;
NUSSLE, D ;
REYMONDBERTHET, C .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1991, 66 (08) :941-947
[6]   ENDOMYSIAL VERSUS GLIADIN ANTIBODIES IN DIAGNOSIS OF CELIAC-DISEASE IN SHORT CHILDREN WITH NO GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS [J].
CACCIARI, E ;
SALARDI, S ;
TIBERI, S ;
VOLTA, U ;
MOLINARO, N ;
BIANCHI, FB ;
BOTTAZZO, GF .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8765) :521-521
[7]   SEROLOGICAL MARKERS AND CELIAC-DISEASE - A NEW DIAGNOSTIC-APPROACH [J].
CALABUIG, M ;
TORREGOSA, R ;
POLO, P ;
TUSET, L ;
TOMAS, C ;
ALVAREZ, V ;
GARCIAVILA, A ;
BRINES, J ;
VILAR, P ;
FARRE, C ;
VAREA, V .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1990, 10 (04) :435-442
[8]   IGA CLASS ENDOMYSIUM ANTIBODIES IN DERMATITIS-HERPETIFORMIS AND CELIAC-DISEASE [J].
CHORZELSKI, TP ;
SULEJ, J ;
TCHORZEWSKA, H ;
JABLONSKA, S ;
BEUTNER, EH ;
KUMAR, V .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1983, 420 (DEC) :325-334
[9]  
COOKE WT, 1984, COELIAC DISEASE, P251
[10]   SEROLOGICAL SCREENING OF CELIAC-DISEASE - CHOOSING THE OPTIMAL PROCEDURE ACCORDING TO VARIOUS PREVALENCE VALUES [J].
CORRAO, G ;
CORAZZA, GR ;
ANDREANI, ML ;
TORCHIO, P ;
VALENTINI, RA ;
GALATOLA, G ;
QUAGLINO, D ;
GASBARRINI, G ;
DIORIO, F .
GUT, 1994, 35 (06) :771-775