Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases

被引:188
作者
Hoefnagel, Laurien D. C. [1 ]
van de Vijver, Marc J. [2 ]
van Slooten, Henk-Jan [3 ,4 ]
Wesseling, Pieter [5 ,6 ]
Wesseling, Jelle [7 ]
Westenend, Pieter J. [8 ]
Bart, Joost [9 ]
Seldenrijk, Cornelis A. [10 ]
Nagtegaal, Iris D. [5 ]
Oudejans, Joost [11 ]
van der Valk, Paul
van der Groep, Petra [12 ,13 ]
de Vries, Elisabeth G. E. [14 ]
van der Wall, Elsken [13 ]
van Diest, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Pathol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Alkmaar, Dept Pathol, NL-1815 JD Alkmaar, Netherlands
[4] Med Ctr Zaandam, Dept Pathol, NL-1502 DV Zaandam, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Pathol, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Pathol Lab, NL-3317 DA Dordrecht, Netherlands
[9] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[10] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Pathol, NL-3435 CM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[11] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Pathol, NL-3582 KE Utrecht, Netherlands
[12] Free Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[13] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Internal Med & Dermatol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[14] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med Oncol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; HER-2; STATUS; OVEREXPRESSION; DISCORDANCE; EXPRESSION; IMPACT; HETEROGENEITY; SITES;
D O I
10.1186/bcr2645
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: When breast cancer patients develop distant metastases, the choice of systemic treatment is usually based on tissue characteristics of the primary tumor as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or molecular analysis. Several previous studies have shown that the immunophenotype of distant breast cancer metastases may be different from that of the primary tumor (receptor conversion), leading to inappropriate choice of systemic treatment. The studies published so far are however small and/or methodologically suboptimal. Therefore, definite conclusions that may change clinical practice could not yet be drawn. We therefore aimed to study receptor conversion for estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in a large group of distant (non-bone) breast cancer metastases by re-staining all primary tumors and metastases with current optimal immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization methods on full sections. Methods: A total of 233 distant breast cancer metastases from different sites (76 skin, 63 liver, 43 lung, 44 brain and 7 gastro-intestinal) were IHC stained for ER alpha, PR and HER2, and expression was compared to that of the primary tumor. HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) was done in cases of IHC conversion or when primary tumors or metastases showed an IHC 2+ result. Results: Using a 10% threshold, receptor conversion by IHC for ER alpha, PR occurred in 10.3%, 30.0% of patients, respectively. In 10.7% of patients, conversion from ER+ or PR+ to ER-/PR- and in 3.4% from ER-/PR- to ER+ or PR+ was found. Using a 1% threshold, ER alpha and PR conversion rates were 15.1% and 32.6%. In 12.4% of patients conversion from ER+ or PR+ to ER-/PR-, and 8.2% from ER-/PR-to ER+ or PR+ occurred. HER2 conversion occurred in 5.2%. Of the 12 cases that showed HER2 conversion by IHC, 5 showed also conversion by ISH. One further case showed conversion by ISH, but not by IHC. Conversion was mainly from positive in the primary tumor to negative in the metastases for ER alpha and PR, while HER2 conversion occurred equally both ways. PR conversion occurred significantly more often in liver, brain and gastro-intestinal metastases. Conclusions: Receptor conversion by immunohistochemistry in (non-bone) distant breast cancer metastases does occur, is relatively uncommon for ER alpha and HER2, and is more frequent for PR, especially in brain, liver and gastrointestinal metastases.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Discordance between Receptor Status in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Study of Bone and Bone Marrow Biopsies [J].
Amir, E. ;
Ooi, W. S. ;
Simmons, C. ;
Kahn, H. ;
Christakis, M. ;
Popovic, S. ;
Kalina, M. ;
Chesney, A. ;
Singh, G. ;
Clemons, M. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 20 (10) :763-768
[2]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL
[3]   Progesterone receptor status of breast cancer metastases [J].
Brankovic-Magic, M ;
Jankovic, R ;
Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z ;
Nikolic-Vukosavljevic, D .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 128 (01) :55-60
[4]   The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality [J].
Bray, F ;
McCarron, P ;
Parkin, DM .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (06) :229-239
[5]  
Broom RJ, 2009, ANTICANCER RES, V29, P1557
[6]   Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy [J].
Cui, XJ ;
Schiff, R ;
Arpino, G ;
Osborne, CK ;
Lee, AV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7721-7735
[7]  
Edgerton SM, 2003, APPL IMMUNOHISTO M M, V11, P214
[8]   Comparison of HER-2 status between primary breast cancer and corresponding distant metastatic sites [J].
Gancberg, D ;
Di Leo, A ;
Cardoso, F ;
Rouas, G ;
Pedrocchi, M ;
Paesmans, M ;
Verhest, A ;
Bernard-Marty, C ;
Piccart, MJ ;
Larsimont, D .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (07) :1036-1043
[9]   Comparison of HER-2 status determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in primary and metastatic breast carcinoma [J].
Gong, Y ;
Booser, DJ ;
Sneige, N .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (09) :1763-1769
[10]  
HOLDAWAY IM, 1983, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V52, P479, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830801)52:3<479::AID-CNCR2820520317>3.0.CO