Diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in poplar grown under field conditions

被引:177
作者
Ulrich, Kristina [2 ]
Ulrich, Andreas [1 ]
Ewald, Dietrich [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Landschaftsstoffdynam, ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Inst Forstgenet & Forstpflanzenzuchtung, D-15377 Waldsieversdorf, Germany
关键词
endophytic bacteria; bacterial community composition; poplar; 16S rRNA gene;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00419.x
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bacterial endophytes may be important for plant health and other ecologically relevant functions of poplar trees. The composition of endophytic bacteria colonizing the aerial parts of poplar was studied using a multiphasic approach. The terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rRNA genes demonstrated the impact of different hybrid poplar clones on the endophytic community structure. Detailed analysis of endophytic bacteria using cultivation methods in combination with cloning of 16S rRNA genes amplified from plant tissue revealed a high phylogenetic diversity of endophytic bacteria with a total of 53 taxa at the genus level that included Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The community structure displayed clear differences in terms of the presence and relative proportions of bacterial taxa between the four poplar clones studied. The results showed that the genetic background of the hybrid poplar clones corresponded well with the endophytic community structure. Out of the 513 isolates and 209 clones identified, Actinobacteria, in particular the family Microbacteriaceae, made up the largest fraction of the isolates, whereas the clone library was dominated by Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria. The most abundant genera among the isolates were Pseudomonas and Curtobacterium, while Sphingomonas prevailed among the clones.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, NATO ASI SERIES G, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-79906-8_18
[2]   Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants [J].
Araújo, WL ;
Marcon, J ;
Maccheroni, W ;
van Elsas, JD ;
van Vuurde, JWL ;
Azevedo, JL .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (10) :4906-4914
[3]  
Bacon CW, 2006, PLANT-ASSOCIATED BACTERIA, P155
[4]  
BACON M, 1971, Northwest Science, V45, P270
[5]  
Bangera MG, 1996, MOL PLANT MICROBE IN, V9, P83, DOI 10.1094/MPMI-9-0083
[6]  
Beattie GA, 2006, PLANT-ASSOCIATED BACTERIA, P1
[7]  
Behrendt U, 2002, INT J SYST EVOL MICR, V52, P1441, DOI [10.1099/ijs.0.02138-0, 10.1099/00207713-52-5-1441]
[8]   ENDOPHYTIC BACTERIA IN GRAPEVINE [J].
BELL, CR ;
DICKIE, GA ;
HARVEY, WLG ;
CHAN, JWYF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 41 (01) :46-53
[9]   Potential for misidentification of a spore-forming Paenibacillus polymyxa isolate as an endophyte by using culture-based methods [J].
Bent, E ;
Chanway, CP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (09) :4650-4652
[10]   Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi [J].
Berg, G ;
Krechel, A ;
Ditz, M ;
Sikora, RA ;
Ulrich, A ;
Hallmann, J .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2005, 51 (02) :215-229