Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis - Does the time interval matter?

被引:62
作者
de Vries, A
Donkervoort, SC
van Geloven, AAW
Pierik, EGJM
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] OLVG Hosp, NL-1090 HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Isala Clin, NL-8011 JW Zwolle, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2005年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
choledochocystolithiasis; endoscopic retrograde cholanglography (ERC); laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); time interval conversion;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-004-2206-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Preceding endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in patients with choledochocystolithiasis impedes laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and increases risk of conversion. We studied the influence of time interval between ERC and LC on the course of LC. Methods: All patients treated for choledochocystolithiasis with ERC and LC during 1996-2001 were studied retrospectively, comparing the course of LC in three time interval groups; LC < 2, 2-6, and > 6 weeks after ERC. Primary outcomes: adhesions, bile duct injury, operating time, and conversion-rate. Results: Eighty-three patients were studied (group 1, n = 23; group 2, n = 15; group 3, n = 45). Adhesions, operation time, and bile duct damage did not significantly differ between the groups. The conversion rate in group 2 is significantly higher compared to group I (p = 0.027, OR 11 (1.13-106.8)) Conclusions: A higher conversion rate of LC is found 26 weeks after ERC compared to LC within 2 weeks. However, further research is needed to gain more reliable data on whether this is caused by timing.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1001
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Timing of cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: Outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission and after recurrent biliary pancreatitis
    Alimoglu, O
    Ozkan, OV
    Sahin, M
    Akcakaya, A
    Eryilmaz, R
    Bas, G
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 27 (03) : 256 - 259
  • [2] Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial
    Boerma, D
    Rauws, EAJ
    Keulemans, YCA
    Janssen, IMC
    Bolwerk, CJM
    Timmer, R
    Boerma, EJ
    Obertop, H
    Huibregtse, K
    Gouma, DJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9335) : 761 - 765
  • [3] Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Boraschi, P
    Gigoni, R
    Braccini, G
    Lamacchia, M
    Rossi, M
    Falaschi, F
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (06) : 593 - 598
  • [4] Choledocholithiasis: New approach to an old problem
    Cervantes, J
    Rojas, G
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (10) : 1270 - 1272
  • [5] Chang KK, 1996, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V43, P203
  • [6] Contractor Qais Qutub, 2004, Indian J Gastroenterol, V23, P8
  • [7] Of stones and bile ducts, single- vs two-stage management
    Cuschieri, A
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (12): : 1124 - 1124
  • [8] EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi
    Cuschieri, A
    Lezoche, E
    Morino, M
    Croce, E
    Lacy, A
    Toouli, J
    Faggioni, A
    Ribeiro, VM
    Jakimowicz, J
    Visa, J
    Hanna, GB
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (10): : 952 - 957
  • [9] RISKS OF LEAVING THE GALLBLADDER INSITU AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR BILE-DUCT STONES
    HILL, J
    MARTIN, DF
    TWEEDLE, DEF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (05) : 554 - 557
  • [10] Ke Zhong-Wei, 2003, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, V2, P576