Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses:: accuracy and patient acceptance

被引:29
作者
Goehde, SC
Descher, E
Boekstegers, A
Lauenstein, T
Kühle, C
Ruehm, SG
Ajaj, W
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Private Practice Gastroenterol, D-45127 Essen, Germany
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2005年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
magnetic resonance colonography; barium; fecal tagging; patient acceptance; diagnostic accuracy;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-004-0290-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) with fecal tagging has recently been investigated in clinical studies for the detection of polyps. We assessed fecal tagging MRC in a field trial. Methods: Forty-two patients in a private gastroenterologic practice underwent MRC with barium-based fecal tagging (150 mL of 100% barium at each of 6 main meals before MRC) and conventional colonoscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of MRC and patient acceptance were assessed and compared with the respective results of conventional colonoscopy. Results: Eighteen percent of all MRC examinations showed a remaining high stool signal in the colon that impeded a reliable inclusion or exclusion of polyps. On a lesion-by-lesion basis, sensitivities for polyp detection were 100% for polyps larger than 2 cm (n = 1), 40% for polyps between 10 and 19 mm, 16.7% for polyps between 6 and 9 mm, and 9.1% for polyps smaller than 6 mm. The main reason for the low acceptance of MRC was the barium preparation, which was rated worse than the bowel cleaning procedure with conventional colonoscopy. Conclusion: MRC with fecal tagging must be further optimized. The large amount of barium resulted in poor patient acceptance, and barium according to this protocol did not provide sufficient stool darkening. Other strategies, such as increasing the hydration of stool, must be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 583
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Stool screening for colorectal cancer: evolution from occult blood to molecular markers [J].
Ahlquist, DA ;
Shuber, AP .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 315 (1-2) :157-168
[2]  
Debatin JF, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P174
[3]  
ELWOOD JM, 1995, CANCER DETECT PREV, V19, P337
[4]   A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[5]   Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography [J].
Goehde, SC ;
Ajaj, W ;
Lauenstein, T ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ladd, ME .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (02) :272-278
[6]   Cancer statistics, 1998 [J].
Landis, SH ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1998, 48 (01) :6-+
[7]   MR colonography without colonic cleansing: A new strategy to improve patient acceptance [J].
Lauenstein, T ;
Holtmann, G ;
Schoenfelder, D ;
Bosk, S ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Debatin, JF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (04) :823-827
[8]   MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: Initial clinical experience [J].
Lauenstein, TC ;
Goehde, SC ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Holtmann, G ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) :248-254
[9]  
LIEBERMAN DA, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, P946
[10]  
LIEBERMAN DA, 1995, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V109, P989