A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: the impact of treatment preference

被引:58
作者
Burke, L. E. [1 ,2 ]
Warziski, M.
Styn, M. A.
Music, E.
Hudson, A. G.
Sereika, S. M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth & Community Syst, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth & Community Syst, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
treatment preference; lacto-ovo-vegetarian; behavioral weight-loss treatment; randomized clinical trial;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With obesity rampant, methods to achieve sustained weight loss remain elusive. Objective: To compare the long-term weight-loss efficacy of 2 cal and fat-restricted diets, standard (omnivorous) versus lacto-ovo-vegetarian, and to determine the effect of a chosen diet versus an assigned diet. Design, subjects: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 176 adults who were sedentary and overweight (mean body mass index, 34.0 kg/m(2)). Participants were first randomly assigned to either receive their preferred diet or be assigned to a diet group and second, were given their diet of preference or randomly assigned to a standard weight-loss diet or a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet. Participants underwent a university-based weight-control program consisting of daily dietary and exercise goals plus 12 months of behavioral counseling followed by a 6-month maintenance phase. Measurements: Percentage change in body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, low- and high-density lipoprotein, glucose, insulin and macronutrient intake. Results: The program was completed by 132 (75%) of the participants. At 18 months, mean percentage weight loss was greater (P = 0.01) in the two groups that were assigned a diet (standard, 8.0% (s.d., 7.8%); vegetarian, 7.9% (s.d., 8.1%)) than in those provided the diet of their choice (standard, 3.9% (s.d., 6.1%); vegetarian, 5.3% (s.d., 6.2%)). No difference was observed in weight loss between the two types of diet. Over the 18-month program, all groups showed significant weight loss. Conclusions: Participants assigned to their dietary preference did not have enhanced treatment outcomes. However, all groups lost weight with losses ranging from 4 to 8% at 18 months.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 176
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1521/JSCP.1983.1.4.343
[2]   The effects of a low-fat, plant-based dietary intervention on body weight, metabolism, and insulin sensitivity [J].
Barnard, ND ;
Scialli, AR ;
Turner-McGrievy, G ;
Lanou, AJ ;
Glass, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 (09) :991-997
[3]  
Barnard Neal D, 2004, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V24, P229, DOI 10.1097/00008483-200407000-00004
[4]   Diet and physical activity behaviors among Americans trying to lose weight: 2000 behavioral risk factor surveillance system [J].
Bish, CL ;
Blanck, HM ;
Serdula, MK ;
Marcus, M ;
Kohl, HW ;
Khan, LK .
OBESITY RESEARCH, 2005, 13 (03) :596-607
[5]   PREFER study: A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management - rationale, design and baseline characteristics [J].
Burke, LE ;
Choo, J ;
Music, E ;
Warziski, M ;
Styn, MA ;
Kim, Y ;
Sevick, MA .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 27 (01) :34-48
[6]  
BURKE LE, 1999, OBES RES S1, V7, pS18
[7]  
DABY R, 1988, PSYCHOLOGY, V113
[8]   ROLE OF BEHAVIOR-THEORY IN BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE [J].
EPSTEIN, LH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (04) :493-498
[9]  
Feldman J, 2005, NETW COMPUT, V16, P18
[10]  
FRIEDEWALD WT, 1972, CLIN CHEM, V18, P499