Control strategies for the reduction of airborne particulate nitrate in California's San Joaquin Valley

被引:32
作者
Kleeman, MJ
Ying, Q
Kaduwela, A
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Calif Environm Protect Agcy, Planning & Tech Support Div, Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95812 USA
关键词
PM2.5; San Joaquin Valley; IMS95; CRPAQS; emissions controls;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of NO,, volatile organic compound (VOC), and NH3 emissions control programs on the formation of particulate ammonium nitrate in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) was examined under the typical winter conditions that existed on 4-6 January, 1996. The UCD/CIT photochemical transport model was used for this study so that the source origin of primary particulate matter and secondary particulate matter could be identified. When averaged across the entire SJV, the model results predict that 13-18 % of the reactive nitrogen (NOy = NOx+ reaction products of NOx) emitted from local sources within the SJV was converted to nitrate at the ground level. Each gram of NO, emitted locally within the SJV (expressed as NO2) produced 0.23-0.31 g of particulate ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3 which is much smaller than the maximum theoretical yield of 1.7 g of NH4NO3 per gram of NO2. The fraction of reactive nitrogen converted to nitrate varied strongly as a function of location. Urban regions with large amounts of fresh NO emissions converted little reactive nitrogen to nitrate, while remote areas had up to 70% conversion (equivalent to approximately 1.2 g of NH4NO3 per gram of NO2). The use of a single spatially averaged ratio of NH4NO3/NOx as a predictor of how changes to NO, emissions would affect particulate nitrate concentrations would not be accurate at all locations in the SJV under the conditions studied. The largest local sources of particulate nitrate in the SJV were predicted to be diesel engines and catalyst equipped gasoline engines under the conditions experienced on 6 January, 1996. Together, these sources accounted for less than half of the ground-level nitrate aerosol in the SJV. The remaining fraction of the aerosol nitrate originated from reactive nitrogen originally released upwind of the SJV. The majority of this upwind reactive nitrogen was already transformed to nitrate by the time it entered the SJV. The effect of local emissions controls on this upwind material was small. A 50% reduction in NOx emissions applied to sources within the SJV reduced the predicted concentration of total nitrate by approximately 25% during the study episode. VOC emissions controls were less effective, while reasonable NH3 emissions controls had the smallest effect on the amount of ammonium nitrate produced. A 50% reduction in VOC emissions lowered predicted concentrations of total nitrate by 17.5%, while a 50% reduction in NH3 emissions lowered predicted concentrations of total nitrate by only 10%. This latter result is expected since the formation of ammonium nitrate aerosol is limited by the availability of gas-phase nitric acid, with large amounts of excess NH3 available. NO, emissions controls appear to be the most efficient method to reduce the concentration of locally generated particulate nitrate in the SJV under the conditions experienced on 4-6 January, 1996. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5325 / 5341
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Evaluating the first-order effect of intraannual temperature variability on urban air pollution [J].
Aw, J ;
Kleeman, MJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D12)
[2]   A DETAILED MECHANISM FOR THE GAS-PHASE ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
CARTER, WPL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1990, 24 (03) :481-518
[3]   A COMPARISON OF ADVECTION ALGORITHMS COUPLED WITH CHEMISTRY [J].
CHOCK, DP ;
WINKLER, SL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 28 (16) :2659-2675
[4]  
CHOW JC, 1997, SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY I
[5]  
*DRI, 1998, 9801 DRI
[6]  
GOODIN WR, 1979, J APPL METEOROL, V18, P761, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0761:ACOIMF>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   A comparison of the UCD/CIT air quality model and the CMB source-receptor model for primary airborne particulate matter [J].
Held, T ;
Ying, Q ;
Kleeman, MJ ;
Schauer, JJ ;
Fraser, MP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (12) :2281-2297
[9]   Modeling particulate matter in the San Joaquin Valley with a source-oriented externally mixed three-dimensional photochemical grid model [J].
Held, T ;
Ying, Q ;
Kaduwela, A ;
Kleeman, M .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (22) :3689-3711
[10]  
Hernández Araico S, 2000, INSULA, V55, P30