Competition in Korean mobile telecommunications market: business strategy and regulatory environment

被引:27
作者
Choi, SK [1 ]
Lee, MH [1 ]
Chung, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] Informat & Commun Univ, Yusong Gu, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
mobile telephony; business strategy; cost advantage; differentiation advantage;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00075-6
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
After the launch of PCS in 1997, the Korean mobile telephony market achieved a remarkable subscriber base growth. The market is composed of a differentiation advantage seeker, SK Telecom; a cost advantage seeker, LG Telecom; and three other carriers: Hansol PCS, Korea Telecom Freetel, and Shunsegi Telecom that do not show clear adherence to any type of advantage. Despite large growth in subscribers, price competition has not occurred after the competition except in handset subsidies. New restrictions on handset subsidies, closing the only door for price competition, favored a differentiation seeker at the expense of a cost advantage seeker. The Ministry of Information and Communication's provisional plan for quality evaluation without price deregulation runs the risk of quality over-provision that is sub-optimal, and may further distort the business performance of carriers. Overall complete deregulation is necessary, in order to enhance the competitiveness of the Korean mobile telephony industry and to increase consumer welfare. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BESANKO D, 1996, EC STRATEGY IND ANAL
[2]  
CHO S, 1993, TARIFFS MOBILE TELEC
[3]  
CHOI SK, 1995, J INFORMATION SOC, V7, P89
[4]   Duopoly and competition - The case of American cellular telephone [J].
Fullerton, HS .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1998, 22 (07) :593-607
[5]   An investment view of mobile telecommunications in the European Union [J].
Gruber, H .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1999, 23 (7-8) :521-538
[6]  
KELLOG MK, 1992, FEDERAL TELECOMMUNIC
[7]  
LEE JW, 1997, WEEKLY EC, V443
[8]  
LEE MH, 1997, COMPETITIVE PERFORMA
[9]  
LEE NC, 1999, QUALITY EVALUATION P
[10]  
*MIN INF COMM, 1999, PROP QUAL EV SYST TE