Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke

被引:278
作者
Cauraugh, JH
Summers, JJ
机构
[1] Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
[2] University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Stroke interferes with voluntary control of motor actions. Although spontaneous recovery of function can occur, restoration of normal motor function in the hemiplegic upper limb is noted in fewer than 15 % of individuals. However, there is increasing evidence to suggest that in addition to injury-related reorganization, motor cortex functions can be altered by individual motor experiences. Such neural plasticity has major implications for the type of rehabilitative training administered post-stroke. This review proposes that noteworthy upper extremity gains toward motor recovery evolve from activity-dependent intervention based on theoretical motor control constructs and interlimb coordination principles. Founded on behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms, bilateral movement training/practice has shown great promise in expediting progress toward chronic stroke recovery in the upper extremity. Planning and executing bilateral movements post-stroke may facilitate cortical neural plasticity by three mechanisms: (a) motor cortex disinhibition that allows increased use of the spared pathways of the damaged hemisphere, (b) increased recruitment of the ipsilateral pathways from the contralesional or contralateral hemisphere to supplement the damaged crossed corticospinal pathways, and (c) upregulation of descending premotorneuron commands onto propriospinal neurons. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 320
页数:12
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Alsenawi D., Cooke J., Matching movements made independently by the two arms in normal humans, J. Motor Behav., 17, pp. 321-334, (1985)
[2]  
Altschuler E.L., Wisdom S.B., Stone L., Foster C., Galasko D., Llewellyn D.M., Ramachandran V., Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror, Lancet, 353, pp. 2035-2036, (1999)
[3]  
Bates E., Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Dick F., Sereno M., Knight R.T., Dronkers N.F., Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping, Nat. Neurosci., 6, pp. 448-450, (2003)
[4]  
Bernstein N.A., The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements, (1967)
[5]  
Binkofski F., Seitz R.J., Modulation of the BOLD-response in early recovery from sensorimotor stroke, Neurology, 63, pp. 1223-1229, (2004)
[6]  
Boroojerdi B., Ziemann U., Chen R., Butefisch C., Cohen L., Mechanisms underlying human motor system plasticity, Muscle Nerve, 24, pp. 602-613, (2001)
[7]  
Buonomano D.V., Merzenich M.M., Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 21, pp. 149-186, (1998)
[8]  
Butefisch C.M., Davis B.C., Wise S.P., Sawaki L., Kopylev L., Classen J., Cohen L.G., Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex, PNAS, 97, pp. 3661-3665, (2000)
[9]  
Butefisch C.M., Khurana V., Kopylev L., Cohen L.G., Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation, J. Neurophysiol., 91, pp. 2110-2116, (2004)
[10]  
Byblow W.D., Summers J.J., Semjen A., Wuyts I.J., Carson R.G., Spontaneous and intentional pattern switching in a multisegmental bimanual coordination task, Motor Contr., 3, pp. 372-393, (1999)