Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device

被引:108
作者
Botto, H [1 ]
Lebret, T [1 ]
Barré, P [1 ]
Orsoni, JL [1 ]
Hervé, JM [1 ]
Lugagne, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Foch, Serv Urol, F-92150 Suresnes, France
关键词
D O I
10.1089/089277901750161917
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and the safety of a new transurethral endoscopic device using bipolar electrocautery, the Gyrus system. This system permits rapid prostate tissue removal by endoscopic vaporization with little bleeding and no pad return using saline irrigation and therefore eliminating TURF syndrome, Patients and Methods: Forty-two patients (mean age 70; range 49-90 years) with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) without suspected cancer, confirmed by digital rectal examination and PSA tests, were treated between October 1998 and February 1999 with the Gyrus and evaluated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate. Results: No postoperative bleeding necessitating catheterization for postoperative retention occurred. The duration of the procedure was less than or equal to 30 minutes in 12 patients, 30 to 60 minutes in 27 patients, and >60 minutes in 3 patients. The mean time of postoperative continuous bladder irrigation was 1.2 days (0.5-3 days), The mean catheterization time was 1.4 days (range 0.5-5 days). Urethral stricture requiring treatment occurred in two patients, Dysuria was reported by four patients (mild two, severe two). The postoperative hospitalization was a mean of 2.2 days. The mean peak flow rate increased from 7.9 to 19.7 mL/sec at 3 months, and the IPSS decreased from 16 to 9 at 3 months. Conclusion: Our preliminary results with a bipolar electrode for electrovaporization of the prostate using the Gyrus suggest that it is a useful and safe endoscopic device, It appears to be an effective treatment for BPH; however, long-term results (i.e., 1-year follow-up) should be evaluated. This pilot series permits a comparative study with TURF to assess the benefits for patients and the health care system.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 316
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF URINARY SYMPTOMS AFTER TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE [J].
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
LARSEN, EH ;
MADSEN, PO ;
DORFLINGER, T .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (03) :613-615
[2]  
Conrad Stefan, 1996, Journal of Urology, V155, p704A
[3]   Sorbitol-mannitol solution for urological electrosurgical resection - A safer fluid than glycine 1.5% [J].
Dawkins, GPC ;
Miller, RA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (02) :99-102
[4]  
DOLL HA, 1992, J UROLOGY, V147, P1566, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37628-0
[5]   TRANS-URETHRAL PROSTATECTOMY - PRACTICE ASPECTS OF THE DOMINANT OPERATION IN AMERICAN UROLOGY [J].
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
DOWD, JB ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
PETERS, PC ;
PROCTOR, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (02) :248-253
[6]  
Kabalin JN, 1996, LASER SURG MED, V18, P221, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<221::AID-LSM1>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-U
[8]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE USING A MODIFIED ELECTRO-VAPORIZING LOOP AND TRANSURETHRAL LASER VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE [J].
KAPLAN, SA ;
TE, AE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05) :1785-1790
[9]   A prospective randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and transurethral vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in the management of men with BPH [J].
Küpeli, S ;
Baltaci, S ;
Soygür, T ;
Aytaç, S ;
Yilmaz, E ;
Budak, M .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 34 (01) :15-18
[10]   Thick loop transurethral resection of the prostate [J].
Perlmutter, AP ;
Vallancien, G .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (02) :161-165