Amphetamines in hair by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

被引:18
作者
Sweeney, SA
Kelly, RC
Bourland, JA
Johnson, T
Brown, WC
Lee, H
Lewis, E
机构
[1] Associated Pathologists Labs, Las Vegas, NV 89119 USA
[2] Diagnost Inc, Mississauga, ON L4Z 2E9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/22.6.418
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Human hair was collected from the occipital crown region of the head from several subjects; these hair samples were presumptively positive for amphetamines by a previously evaluated immunoassay. Hair was washed briefly with methanol to remove external contamination, then extracted with hot methanol for 2 h to recover the drugs. The extracts were evaporated to dryness, reconstituted in buffer, and analyzed using a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique adapted for the detection of amphetamines in hair. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used as the reference technique. Cross-reactivity of several related compounds was evaluated by equating the inverse of the ligand concentration at 50% antibody binding to the affinity constant for each compound. The ratio of a compound's affinity constant to that for d-methamphetamine was used to derive percent cross-reactivity. These experiments yielded values of 30.8% for d- amphetamine, 7.4% for I-methamphetamine, 4.3% for phentermine, 2.9% for/- amphetamine, and <1% for ephedrine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Cross-reactivity of unrelated compounds was found to be non-existent. The optimum cutoff concentration was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to be 300 pg/mg and the observed limit of detection was 60 pg/mg. Intra-assay precision at 300 pg/mg was 3.3% (coefficient of variation, CV), and the interassay CV was 10.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of the method were 83% and 92%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 424
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The feasibility of the detection and quantitation of β-adrenergic blockers by solid-phase extraction and subsequent derivatization with methaneboronic acid [J].
Branum, GD ;
Sweeney, S ;
Palmeri, A ;
Haines, L ;
Huber, C .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 22 (02) :135-141
[3]  
Cartmell LW, 1991, LAT AM ANTIQ, V2, P260, DOI 10.2307/972171
[4]   TESTING HUMAN HAIR FOR DRUGS OF ABUSE .2. IDENTIFICATION OF UNIQUE COCAINE METABOLITES IN HAIR OF DRUG-ABUSERS AND EVALUATION OF DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES [J].
CONE, EJ ;
YOUSEFNEJAD, D ;
DARWIN, WD ;
MAGUIRE, T .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 15 (05) :250-255
[5]  
*DIAGN INC, 1997, DIAGN SINGL STEP PHA
[6]   DRUG-TESTING IN THE WORKPLACE - COULD A POSITIVE TEST FOR ONE OF THE MANDATED DRUGS BE FOR REASONS OTHER THAN ILLICIT USE OF THE DRUG [J].
ELSOHLY, MA ;
JONES, AB .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 19 (06) :450-458
[7]   Detection of methamphetamine in sweat by EIA and GC-MS [J].
Fay, J ;
Fogerson, R ;
Schoendorfer, D ;
Niedbala, RS ;
Spiehler, V .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 20 (06) :398-403
[8]   DRUGS-OF-ABUSE TESTING IN URINE - STATISTICAL APPROACH AND EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF IMMUNOCHEMICAL AND CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES [J].
FERRARA, SD ;
TEDESCHI, L ;
FRISON, G ;
BRUSINI, G ;
CASTAGNA, F ;
BERNARDELLI, B ;
SOREGAROLI, D .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 18 (05) :278-291
[9]   Qualitative detection of opiates in sweat by EIA and GC-MS [J].
Fogerson, R ;
Schoendorfer, D ;
Fay, J ;
Spiehler, V .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 21 (06) :451-458
[10]  
GOLDSTEIN A, 1974, PRINCIPLES DRUG ACTI, P48