Presenting the Results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a Consumer Audience: A Qualitative Study

被引:85
作者
Glenton, Claire [1 ]
Santesso, Nancy [2 ]
Rosenbaum, Sarah
Nilsen, Elin Stromme [1 ]
Rader, Tamara [3 ]
Ciapponi, Agustin [4 ]
Dilkes, Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, Norwegian Branch, Nord Cochrane Ctr, Oslo, Norway
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Grp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy, Argentine Cochrane Ctr IECS, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] La Trobe Univ, Cochrane Consumers & Commun Review Grp, Ctr Hlth Commun & Participat, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
systematic reviews; evidence synthesis; qualitative methods; health service research; patient decision making; decision aids-tools; risk communication or risk perception; INFORMATION; BENEFITS; FORMATS; HARMS; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X10375853
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective. To develop and obtain feedback about a summary format for Cochrane reviews that is accessible to a consumer audience, without oversimplification or incorrect presentation. Methods. We developed 3 versions of a Plain Language Summary (PLS) format of a Cochrane Systematic Review. Using a semi-structured interview guide we tested these versions among 34 members of the public in Norway, Argentina, Canada, and Australia. The authors analyzed feedback, identified problems, and generated new solutions before retesting to produce a final version of a Plain Language Summary format. Results. Participants preferred results presented as words, supplemented by numbers in a table. There was a lack of understanding regarding the difference between a review and an individual study, that the effect is rarely an exact number, that evidence can be of low or high quality, and that level of quality is a separate issue from intervention effect. Participants also found it difficult to move between presentations of dichotomous and continuous outcomes. Rephrasing the introduction helped participants grasp the concept of a review. Confidence intervals were largely ignored or misunderstood. Our attempts to explain them were only partially successful. Text modifiers (''probably,'' ''may'') to convey different levels of quality were only partially understood, whereas symbols with explanations were more helpful. Participants often understood individual information elements about effect size and quality of these results, but did not always actively merge these elements. Conclusion. Through testing and iteration the authors identified and addressed several problems, using explanations, rephrasing, and symbols to present scientific concepts. Other problems remain, including how best to present confidence intervals and continuous outcomes. Future research should also test information elements in combination rather than in isolation. The new Plain Language Summary format is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 577
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
The functions of multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, S .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1999, 33 (2-3) :131-152
[2]
Akl E, COCHRANE DA IN PRESS
[3]
Statistics notes - The cost of dichotomising continuous variables [J].
Altman, DG ;
Royston, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7549) :1080-1080
[4]
Burkell J, 2004, J MED LIBR ASSOC, V92, P200
[5]
Cox R., 1995, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, V6, P239
[6]
Evidence-informed patient choice - Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies [J].
Entwistle, VA ;
Sheldon, TA ;
Sowden, A ;
Watt, IS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 14 (02) :212-225
[7]
FALCKYTTER C, 2004, 12 COCHR C OTT
[8]
Lay perceptions of evidence-based information - a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers [J].
Glenton, C ;
Nilsen, ES ;
Carlsen, B .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
[9]
Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care [J].
Glenton C. ;
Paulsen E.J. ;
Oxman A.D. .
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 5 (1)
[10]
Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative [J].
Glenton, Claire ;
Underland, Vigdis ;
Kho, Michelle ;
Pennick, Victoria ;
Oxman, Andrew D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (08) :770-778