Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives

被引:123
作者
Fischer, GS [1 ]
Tulsky, JA [1 ]
Rose, MR [1 ]
Siminoff, LA [1 ]
Arnold, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
advance directives; patient-doctor communication; medical ethics;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00133.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine patient knowledge about life-sustaining treatments and physician understanding of patient preferences for proxies and treatments after outpatient discussions about advance directives. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview-based and questionnaire-based survey. SETTING:Two university general internal medicine practices, two Department of Veterans Affairs general internal medicine practices, and one university-based geriatrics practice, in two different cities. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients of primary care internists. INTERVENTION: Physicians discussed "advance directives" (ADs) with one randomly selected patient during an outpatient visit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:After the discussions, physicians identified the patient's proxy and predicted the patient's preferences for treatment in 20 scenarios. Patients provided treatment preferences in the 20 scenarios, the name of their preferred surrogate decision maker, and their understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation. Of the 39 patients who discussed resuscitation, 43% were able to identify two important characteristics: 26% identified none: 66% did not know that most patients need mechanical ventilation after undergoing resuscitation. None of the 43 patients who had a discussion about mechanical ventilation had a good understanding of it; 67% did not know that patients generally cannot talk while on ventilators: 46% expressed serious misconceptions about ventilators. There was poor agreement between physicians and their patients regarding treatment preferences in 18 of 20 scenarios (kappa -0.04 to 0,31). Physicians correctly identified the proxy 89% of the time (kappa 0.78), CONCLUSIONS: Patients leave routine AD discussions with serious misconceptions about life-sustaining treatments. Physicians are unable to predict treatment preferences but do learn about patients' preferences for surrogate decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual, 1989, ANN INTERN MED, V111, P327
[2]
BAILECKI L, 1995, CHEST, V108, P1009
[3]
A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR LIFE-SUSTAINING CARE [J].
DANIS, M ;
SOUTHERLAND, LI ;
GARRETT, JM ;
SMITH, JL ;
HIELEMA, F ;
PICKARD, CG ;
EGNER, DM ;
PATRICK, DL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (13) :882-888
[4]
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television - Miracles and misinformation [J].
Diem, SJ ;
Lantos, JD ;
Tulsky, JA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (24) :1578-1582
[5]
EDINGER W, 1992, J FAM PRACTICE, V35, P650
[6]
ADVANCE CARE PLANNING AS A PROCESS - STRUCTURING THE DISCUSSIONS IN PRACTICE [J].
EMANUEL, LL ;
DANIS, M ;
PEARLMAN, RA ;
SINGER, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1995, 43 (04) :440-446
[7]
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR MEDICAL-CARE - A CASE FOR GREATER USE [J].
EMANUEL, LL ;
BARRY, MJ ;
STOECKLE, JD ;
ETTELSON, LM ;
EMANUEL, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (13) :889-895
[8]
Fleiss JL, 1981, STATISTICAL METHODS, P211, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530193
[9]
THE GREEN EGGS AND HAM PHENOMENA [J].
FORROW, L .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1994, 24 (06) :S29-S32
[10]
KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIOR OF ELDERLY PERSONS REGARDING LIVING WILLS [J].
GAMBLE, ER ;
MCDONALD, PJ ;
LICHSTEIN, PR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 151 (02) :277-280