Overview of the MELD score and the UNOS adult liver allocation system

被引:64
作者
Martin, A. P. [1 ]
Bartels, M. [1 ]
Hauss, J. [1 ]
Fangmann, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Leipzig, Dept Visceral & Transplant Surg, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.025
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 [免疫学];
摘要
On February 27, 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) introduced a new allocation policy for cadaveric liver transplants, based on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. This new policy stratifies the patients based on their risk of death while on the waiting list. We analyzed the background and main features of this new allocation policy to evaluate the effects on waiting list dynamics as well as the accuracy of MELD as a predictor of pretransplantation mortality and posttransplantation outcome. MELD has proved to be accurate as a predictor of waiting list mortality, but seems to be less accurate to predict posttransplantation outcome. Immediate effects of the new policy were a reduction in the waiting list, while organs were primarily directed to sicker patients with reduced waiting times. There was a statistically but not significantly reduced number of patients removed from the list due to death or severity of sickness. The balance between medical urgency and transplant benefit is still to be defined as is the relationship between pretransplantation criteria and posttransplantation outcomes, and the way this relationship should be included in the allocation policy.
引用
收藏
页码:3169 / 3174
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Harper, A ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Lake, J ;
Edwards, E ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R ;
Turcotte, J ;
Teperman, L .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) :851-858
[2]
THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[3]
Liver and intestine transplantation: summary analysis, 1994-2003 [J].
Hanto, DW ;
Fishbein, TM ;
Pinson, CW ;
Olthoff, KM ;
Shiffman, ML ;
Punch, JD ;
Goodrich, NP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :916-933
[4]
A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease [J].
Kamath, PS ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Malinchoc, M ;
Kremers, W ;
Therneau, TM ;
Kosberg, CL ;
D'Amico, G ;
Dickson, ER ;
Kim, WR .
HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) :464-470
[5]
How will patients be selected for transplantation in the future? [J].
Lucey, MR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :S90-S92
[6]
A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts [J].
Malinchoc, M ;
Kamath, PS ;
Gordon, FD ;
Peine, CJ ;
Rank, J ;
ter Borg, PCJ .
HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 31 (04) :864-871
[7]
The survival benefit of liver transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Freeman, RB ;
Port, FK ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (02) :307-313
[8]
Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Leichtman, AB ;
Gillespie, B ;
Held, PJ .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (01) :12-18
[9]
MERION RM, 2003, OPTN LIV INT TRANSPL
[10]
Summary report of a national conference: Evolving concepts in liver allocation in the MELD and PELD era [J].
Olthoff, KM ;
Brown, RS ;
Delmonico, FL ;
Freeman, RB ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Merion, RM ;
Millis, JM ;
Roberts, JP ;
Shaked, A ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Lucey, MR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :A6-A22