Comparative evaluation of five serological methods and RT-PCR assay for the detection of IPNV in fish

被引:27
作者
Saint-Jean, S
Borrego, JJ
Perez-Prieto, SI
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Fac Ciencias, Dept Microbiol, E-29071 Malaga, Spain
[2] CSIC, Ctr Invest Biol, Madrid 28071, Spain
关键词
fish virus diagnosis; infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV); RT-PCR; flow cytometry; detection methods;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00329-9
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the present study, six diagnostic methods for the detection of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) (indirect immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, immunoperoxidase. immunodot blot, immunostaphylococcus-protein A. and RT-PCR) have been comparatively evaluated using the seroneutralization as the reference assay, and 83 Spanish isolates and 3 reference strains. The most reliable methods were flow cytometry and RT-PCR which could detect virus at titers of 1 X 10(2) and 1 X 10(3) TCID50/ml, respectively. At a multiplicity of infection of 50, both assays allowed the earliest detection of IPNV at 4 h post-inoculation. Indirect immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase assays required at least 6 h post-inoculation to detect viral antigens. The immunodot blot assay possesses low sensitivity and the immunostaphylococcus-protein A test cannot be applied for routine examination of IPNV. Positive reactions were obtained in 100% of the samples tested by sero neutralization and RT-PCR. 90.4% by the flow cytometry, 80.7% by the indirect immunofluorescence assay, 67.5% by the immunoperoxidase, 62.6% by the immunodot blot. and only 27.7% by immunostaphylococcus-protein A test. Therefore. RT-PCR and flow cytometry were the most appropriate and sensitive methods for the routine detection of IPNV from affected fish. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条