Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults

被引:1436
作者
Pickhardt, PJ
Choi, JR
Hwang, I
Butler, JA
Puckett, ML
Hildebrandt, HA
Wong, RK
Nugent, PA
Mysliwiec, PA
Schindler, WR
机构
[1] Natl Naval Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Natl Naval Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, F Edward Hebert Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[4] NCI, Div Canc Prevent, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[6] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[7] Naval Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA USA
[8] Naval Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa031618
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance characteristics of computed tomographic (CT) virtual colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an average-risk screening population. METHODS: A total of 1233 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.8 years) underwent same-day virtual and optical colonoscopy. Radiologists used the three-dimensional endoluminal display for the initial detection of polyps on CT virtual colonoscopy. For the initial examination of each colonic segment, the colonoscopists were unaware of the findings on virtual colonoscopy, which were revealed to them before any subsequent reexamination. The sensitivity and specificity of virtual colonoscopy and the sensitivity of optical colonoscopy were calculated with the use of the findings of the final, unblinded optical colonoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of virtual colonoscopy for adenomatous polyps was 93.8 percent for polyps at least 10 mm in diameter, 93.9 percent for polyps at least 8 mm in diameter, and 88.7 percent for polyps at least 6 mm in diameter. The sensitivity of optical colonoscopy for adenomatous polyps was 87.5 percent, 91.5 percent, and 92.3 percent for the three sizes of polyps, respectively. The specificity of virtual colonoscopy for adenomatous polyps was 96.0 percent for polyps at least 10 mm in diameter, 92.2 percent for polyps at least 8 mm in diameter, and 79.6 percent for polyps at least 6 mm in diameter. Two polyps were malignant; both were detected on virtual colonoscopy, and one of them was missed on optical colonoscopy before the results on virtual colonoscopy were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: CT virtual colonoscopy with the use of a three-dimensional approach is an accurate screening method for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic average-risk adults and compares favorably with optical colonoscopy in terms of the detection of clinically relevant lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2200
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Bond J H, 2000, Semin Gastrointest Dis, V11, P176
  • [2] Virtual colonoscopy - Promising, but not ready for widespread use
    Bond, JH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1540 - 1542
  • [3] Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp
    Bond, JH
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (05) : 454 - 457
  • [4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P193
  • [5] Cotton PB, 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V57, pAB174
  • [6] Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future
    Dachman, AH
    Yoshida, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (02) : 377 - +
  • [7] CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps
    Dachman, AH
    Kuniyoshi, JK
    Boyle, CM
    Samara, Y
    Hoffmann, KR
    Rubin, DT
    Hanan, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) : 989 - 995
  • [8] The Virtual Colonoscopy Study: a large multicenter clinical trial designed to compare two diagnostic screening procedures
    Durkalski, VL
    Palesch, YY
    Pineau, BC
    Vining, DJ
    Cotton, PB
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (05): : 570 - 583
  • [9] A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Fenlon, HM
    Nunes, DP
    Schroy, PC
    Barish, MA
    Clarke, PD
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1496 - 1503
  • [10] FENLON HM, 2000, NEW ENGL J MED, V342, P524