Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions

被引:264
作者
Elkin, Elena B.
Kim, Susie H. M.
Casper, Ephraim S.
Kissane, David W.
Schrag, Deborah
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medicine and oncology practice. How involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for such involvement are uncertain. Patients and Methods In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision making, we asked patients age 70 years and older with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for prognostic information and for involvement in treatment decision making. We also asked treating oncologists (n = 19) to describe their perceptions of patient preferences. Information and decision-making preferences were evaluated in relation to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results Seventy-three patients age 70 to 89 years completed the study interview within 16 weeks of metastatic CRC diagnosis. Most patients (n = 70; 96%) had decided to receive chemotherapy and 61 had initiated treatment. Relatively few (n = 32; 44%) wanted information about expected survival when they made a treatment decision. Preference for prognostic information was more common among men than women (56% v 29%; P = .05). About half of the patients (n = 38; 52%) preferred a passive role in the treatment decision-making process. Physician perceptions were concordant with patient preferences for information in 44% of patient-physician pairs and for decision control in 41% of patient-physician pairs. Conclusion For older patients with advanced CRC, preferences for prognostic information and for an active role in treatment decision making are not easily predictable. Physicians' perceptions are often inconsistent with patients' stated preferences. Explicit discussion of preferred decision-making styles may improve patient-physician encounters.
引用
收藏
页码:5275 / 5280
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Patient preferences for medical decision making - Who really wants to participate? [J].
Arora, NK ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :335-341
[2]   Discussing prognosis: "How much do you want to know?" Talking to patients who are prepared [J].
Back, Anthony L. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (25) :4209-4213
[3]   Discussing prognosis: "How much do you want to know?" Talking to patients who do not want information or who are ambivalent [J].
Back, Anthony L. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (25) :4214-4217
[4]   INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING PREFERENCES OF HOSPITALIZED ADULT CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BLANCHARD, CG ;
LABRECQUE, MS ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLANCHARD, EB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (11) :1139-1145
[5]   Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma - Patient preferences and physician perceptions [J].
Bruera, E ;
Willey, JS ;
Palmer, JL ;
Rosales, M .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (07) :2076-2080
[6]   Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care [J].
Bruera, E ;
Sweeney, C ;
Calder, K ;
Palmer, L ;
Benisch-Tolley, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (11) :2883-2885
[7]   The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support [J].
Butow, PN ;
Maclean, M ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Boyer, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (09) :857-863
[8]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836
[9]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[10]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383