Selective radioprotection of hepatocytes by systemic and portal vein infusions of amifostine in a rat liver tumor model

被引:28
作者
Symon, Z
Levi, M
Ensminger, WD
Smith, DE
Lawrence, TS
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Med, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Coll Med, Dept Pharmacol & Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 50卷 / 02期
关键词
amifostine; radioprotection; micronucleus assay; liver neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01522-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The tolerance of the liver to radiation is too low to permit an effective dose to be delivered to patients who have diffuse intrahepatic cancer. In this study we evaluated whether systemic or portal venous administration of the aminothiol compound, amifostine, could protect the normal liver from the effects of ionizing radiation without compromising tumor cell kill in a rat liver tumor model. Methods and Materials: Rats implanted with liver tumors were infused with 200 mg/kg amifostine over 15 min via the femoral or portal vein. The livers were irradiated with a single 6-Gy fraction 15-20 min after the termination of amifostine infusion. Protection of the liver was assessed by an in vitro hepatocyte micronucleus assay and tumor protection by an in vivo-in vitro clonogenic survival assay. Tissue levels of the active metabolite, free WR-1065, were determined in the tumor and in the normal liver using a specific HPLC assay with electrochemical detection. Results: After a 6-Gy fraction, the frequency of hepatocyte micronuclei after administration of saline, systemic amifostine, and portal venous amifostine was 18.7 +/- 1%, 6.8 +/- 1%, and 9.9 +/- 2%, respectively, corresponding to a radiation equivalent effect of 6 Gy +/- 0.5, 1.8 Gy +/- 0.3, and 2.5 Gy +/- 1.3, respectively. Both amifostine conditions showed considerably less radiation effect than saline-treated controls (p < 0.01); the two amifostine conditions did not differ (p = 0.3). The surviving fraction of tumor cells was not affected by amifostine treatment and was 0.03 +/- 0.02 and 0.05 +/- 0.03 for systemic and portal venous delivery and 0.06 +/- 0.02 for control animals (ANOVA analysis showed no significant difference of the means p = 0.34). Portal venous delivery produced significantly less WR-1065 in the tumor compared to systemic administration (54 <mu>M +/- 36 vs. 343 muM +/- 88, respectively, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Both systemic and portal venous administration of amifostine effectively protect hepatocytes from ionizing radiation without compromising tumor cell kill in a clinically relevant animal model. These findings suggest that amifostine may be a selective normal tissue radioprotectant in liver cancer and that regional/portal infusions may be preferable to systemic dosing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 478
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] AN INVITRO MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY FOR DETERMINING THE RADIOSENSITIVITY OF HEPATOCYTES
    ALATI, T
    ECKL, P
    JIRTLE, RL
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 1989, 119 (03) : 562 - 568
  • [2] Andreopoulos D, 1999, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V175, P34
  • [3] CALABROJONES PM, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P3634
  • [4] INFLUENCE OF WR-2721 ON THE EFFICACY OF RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY OF MURINE TUMORS
    CLEMENT, JJ
    JOHNSON, RK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (3-4): : 539 - 542
  • [5] Escalated focal liver radiation and concurrent hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies
    Dawson, LA
    McGinn, CJ
    Normolle, D
    Ten Haken, RK
    Walker, S
    Ensminger, W
    Lawrence, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (11) : 2210 - 2218
  • [6] DESCHENES J, 1980, IN VITRO CELL DEV B, V16, P722
  • [7] Amifostine does not alter the antitumor activity of cisplatin in a pre-clinical model of testicular cancer
    Dunn, TA
    Schmoll, HJ
    Grunwald, V
    Bokemeyer, C
    Casper, J
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1996, 7 (07) : 795 - 799
  • [8] ENSMINGER WD, 1978, CANCER RES, V38, P3784
  • [9] Grdina DJ, 1999, SEMIN ONCOL, V26, P22
  • [10] American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants
    Hensley, ML
    Schuchter, LM
    Lindley, C
    Meropol, NJ
    Cohen, GI
    Broder, G
    Gradishar, WJ
    Green, DM
    Langdon, RJ
    Mitchell, B
    Negrin, R
    Szatrowski, TP
    Thigpen, JT
    Von Hoff, D
    Wasserman, TH
    Winer, EP
    Pfister, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3333 - 3355