A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results

被引:427
作者
Chen, Stephen T. [1 ]
Darby, Ivan B. [1 ]
Reynolds, Eric C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Dent Sci, Ctr Oral Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
bone grafts; bone regeneration; esthetics; immediate implants; non-submerged healing; radiographic bone levels; randomized-controlled trial; resorbable membranes;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate healing of marginal defects in immediate transmucosal implants grafted with anorganic bovine bone, and to assess mucosal and radiographic outcomes 3-4 years following restoration. Material and methods: Thirty immediate transmucosal implants in maxillary anterior extraction sites of 30 patients randomly received BioOss (TM) (N=10; BG), BioOss (TM) and resorbable collagen membrane (N=10; BG+M) or no graft (N=10; control). Results: Vertical defect height (VDH) reductions of 81.2 +/- 5%, 70.5 +/- 17.4% and 68.2 +/- 16.6%, and horizontal defect depth (HDD) reductions of 71.7 +/- 34.3%, 81.7 +/- 33.7% and 55 +/- 28.4% were observed for BG, BG+M and control groups, respectively, with no significant inter-group differences. Horizontal resorption was significantly greater in control group (48.3 +/- 9.5%) when compared with BG (15.8 +/- 16.9%) and BG+M (20 +/- 21.9%) groups (P=0.000). Ten sites (33.3%) exhibited recession of the mucosa after 6 months; eight (26.7%) had an unsatisfactory esthetic result post-restoration due to recession. Mucosal recession was significantly associated (P=0.032) with buccally positioned implants (HDD 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm) when compared with lingually positioned implants (HDD 2.3 +/- 0.6 mm). In 19 patients followed for a mean of 4.0 +/- 0.7 years, marginal mucosa and bone levels remained stable following restoration. Conclusion: BioOss (TM) significantly reduced horizontal resorption of buccal bone. There is a risk of mucosal recession and adverse soft tissue esthetics with immediate implant placement. However, this risk may be reduced by avoiding a buccal position of the implant in the extraction socket.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 562
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
AINAMO J, 1975, INT DENT J, V25, P229
[2]
Alliot B, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P841
[3]
Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets:: an experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Sukekava, F ;
Wennström, JL ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (06) :645-652
[4]
Becker W, 1990, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V10, P376
[5]
GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION FOR IMPLANTS PLACED INTO EXTRACTION SOCKETS - A STUDY IN DOGS [J].
BECKER, W ;
BECKER, BE ;
HANDELSMAN, M ;
OCHSENBEIN, C ;
ALBREKTSSON, T .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 62 (11) :703-709
[6]
Belser UC, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P30
[7]
Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites [J].
Botticelli, D ;
Berglundh, T ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (10) :820-828
[8]
REMODELING OF INTERDENTAL ALVEOLAR BONE AFTER PERIODONTAL FLAP PROCEDURES ASSESSED BY MEANS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED DENSITOMETRIC IMAGE-ANALYSIS (CADIA) [J].
BRAGGER, U ;
PASQUALI, L ;
KORNMAN, KS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1988, 15 (09) :558-564
[9]
Guided bone regeneration for immediate non-submerged implant placement using bioabsorbable materials in Beagle dogs [J].
Brunel, G ;
Benque, E ;
Elharar, F ;
Sansac, C ;
Duffort, JF ;
Barthet, P ;
Baysse, E ;
Miller, N .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (05) :303-312
[10]
Buser D, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P43