Inhibition of auditory evoked potentials and prepulse inhibition of startle in DBA/2J and DBA/2Hsd inbred mouse substrains

被引:47
作者
Connolly, PM
Maxwell, CR
Kanes, SJ
Abel, T
Liang, YL
Tokarczyk, J
Bilker, WB
Turetsky, BI
Gur, RE
Siegel, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Stanely Ctr Expt Therapeut Psychiat, Div Neuropsychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Div Neuropsychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
auditory evoked potential; prepulse inhibition; startle;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2003.08.035
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous data have shown differences among inbred mouse strains in sensory gating of auditory evoked potentials, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle, and startle amplitude. These measures of sensory and sensorimotor gating have both been proposed as models for genetic determinants of sensory processing abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives. Data from our laboratory suggest that auditory evoked potentials of DBA/2J mice differ from those previously described for DBA/2Hsd. Therefore, we compared evoked potentials and PPI in these two closely related substrains based on the hypothesis that any observed endophenotypic differences are more likely to distinguish relevant from incidental genetic heterogeneity than similar approaches using inbred strains that vary across the entire genome. We found that DBA/2Hsd substrain exhibited reduced inhibition of evoked potentials and reduced startle relative to the DBA/ 2J substrain without alterations in auditory sensitivity, amplitude of evoked potentials or PPI of startle. These results suggest that gating of auditory evoked potentials and PPI of startle measure different aspects of neuronal function. The differences between the substrains might reflect genetic drift. Alternatively, differences could arise from different rearing environments or other non-genetic factors. Future studies will attempt to determine the cause of these differences in sensory and sensorimotor processing between these two closely related inbred mouse strains. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS IN SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS BEFORE AND DURING NEUROLEPTIC TREATMENT - RELATIONSHIP TO PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL STATE [J].
ADLER, G ;
GATTAZ, WF .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 242 (06) :357-361
[2]   INFLUENCE OF STIMULATION PARAMETERS ON AUDITORY STIMULUS-PROCESSING IN SCHIZOPHRENIA AND MAJOR DEPRESSION - AN AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL STUDY [J].
ADLER, G ;
ADLER, J ;
SCHNECK, M ;
ARMBRUSTER, B .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 81 (05) :453-458
[3]   NORMALIZATION BY NICOTINE OF DEFICIENT AUDITORY SENSORY GATING IN THE RELATIVES OF SCHIZOPHRENICS [J].
ADLER, LE ;
HOFFER, LJ ;
GRIFFITH, J ;
WALDO, MC ;
FREEDMAN, R .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 32 (07) :607-616
[4]  
Bakshi VP, 1999, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V288, P643
[5]   Auditory evoked potentials, clinical vs. research applications [J].
Boutros, N ;
Nasrallah, H ;
Leighty, R ;
Torello, M ;
Tueting, P ;
Olson, S .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1997, 69 (2-3) :183-195
[6]   Comparison of four components of sensory gating in schizophrenia and normal subjects: a preliminary report [J].
Boutros, NN ;
Belger, A ;
Campbell, D ;
D'Souza, C ;
Krystal, J .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1999, 88 (02) :119-130
[7]  
BRAFF DL, 1990, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V47, P181
[8]   Inbred mouse strains differ in the regulation of startle and prepulse inhibition of the startle response [J].
Bullock, AE ;
Slobe, BS ;
Vázquez, V ;
Collins, AC .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 111 (06) :1353-1360
[9]   Sensory gating deficits assessed by the P50 event-related potential in subjects with schizotypal personality disorder [J].
Cadenhead, KS ;
Light, GA ;
Geyer, MA ;
Braff, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 157 (01) :55-59
[10]   Non-monotonic dependency of PPI on temporal parameters: differential alteration by ketamine and MK-801 as opposed to apomorphine and DOI [J].
Canal, NM ;
Gourevitch, R ;
Sandner, G .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 156 (2-3) :169-176