Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale

被引:690
作者
Heimberg, RG
Horner, KJ
Juster, HR
Safren, SA
Brown, EJ
Schneier, FR
Liebowitz, MR
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Western Psychiat Inst & Clin, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0033291798007879
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. The present study provides data on the reliability, validity and treatment sensitivity of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), one of the most commonly used clinician-administered scales for the assessment of social phobia. Method. Three hundred and eighty-two patients from several studies of the treatment of social phobia were evaluated. An independent assessor administered the LSAS to each patient prior to the initiation of treatment. Patients also completed other measures of social anxiety and avoidance, although the specific measures varied across samples. Results. The LSAS and its subscales were normally distributed and demonstrated excellent internal consistency. The convergent validity of the LSAS was demonstrated via significant correlations with other commonly-used measures of social anxiety and avoidance. These correlations also tended to be larger than correlations with measures of depression, especially after treatment. However, the pattern of correlations of LSAS subscales with one another and with the other measures suggest that the fear subscales and the avoidance subscales may not be sufficiently distinct in clinical samples. The LSAS was also demonstrated to be sensitive to the effects of pharmacological treatments of social phobia over time and in comparison to double-blind pill placebo. Conclusion. The LSAS appears to be a reliable, valid and treatment sensitive measure of social phobia. Further study of the LSAS, both in samples with severe social phobia and in community samples, is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 212
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   THE SMALL SAMPLE PERFORMANCE OF 4 TESTS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PAIRS OF META-ANALYTICALLY DERIVED EFFECT SIZES [J].
ALLIGER, GM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1995, 21 (04) :789-799
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, STAT METHODS METANAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment
[5]  
Association AP, 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[6]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[7]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[8]   Validation of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale across the anxiety disorders [J].
Brown, EJ ;
Turovsky, J ;
Heimberg, RG ;
Juster, HR ;
Brown, TA ;
Barlow, DH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 9 (01) :21-27
[9]   SOCIAL PHOBIA SUBTYPE AND AVOIDANT PERSONALITY-DISORDER - EFFECT ON SEVERITY OF SOCIAL PHOBIA, IMPAIRMENT, AND OUTCOME OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT [J].
BROWN, EJ ;
HEIMBERG, RG ;
JUSTER, HR .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1995, 26 (03) :467-486
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2