Analysis of key comparison data: assessment of current methods for determining a reference value

被引:21
作者
Elster, C [1 ]
Link, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
key comparison; reference value; uncertainty; weighted mean; clustering; median; bootstrap; maximum likelihood estimator;
D O I
10.1088/0957-0233/12/9/308
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The degree of equivalence of national measurement standards is established by means of key comparisons. The analysis of data from a key comparison requires the determination of a reference value, which is then used to express the degree of equivalence of the national measurement standards. Several methods for determining a reference value are available and these methods can lead to different results. In this study current methods for determining a reference value are compared. In order to quantitatively assess the quality of performance, the methods are applied to a large set of simulated key comparison data. The simulations refer to several realistic scenarios, including correlated measurements. Large differences in the results can occur and none of the methods performs best in every situation. We give some guidance for selecting an appropriate method when assumptions about the reliability of quoted uncertainties can be made.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1438
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), 1999, MUT REC NAT STAND CA
[2]  
CIARLINI P, 1997, ADV MATH TOOLS METRO, V3, P12
[3]  
COX MG, 2000, ADV MATH COMPUTATION, V4, P45
[4]  
Lischer P., 1996, ROBUST STAT DATA ANA, P251
[5]   Estimation of a common mean and weighted means statistics [J].
Rukhin, AL ;
Vangel, MG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (441) :303-308
[6]   Maximum likelihood analysis for heteroscedastic one-way random effects ANOVA in interlaboratory studies [J].
Vangel, MG ;
Rukhin, AL .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (01) :129-136
[7]  
Woger W, 1999, MESSUNSICHERHEIT MES